University of Benin vs Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences vs Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology - KAIST vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA
Side-by-side comparison from 231 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Strong academic standards and learning opportunities
- +Positive personal growth and real-world preparation
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
- +Supportive and caring professors offering personalized attention and feedback
- +Inclusive and welcoming atmosphere fostering personal growth and a sense of belonging
- +Accessible and diverse course offerings with flexibility for individual student timelines
- +High-quality academics and challenging curriculum
- +Excellent facilities and research opportunities
- +Financial benefits and student support
Nothing to show
- +Supportive faculty and good academic atmosphere
- +Career-focused programs and hands-on learning opportunities
- +Well-maintained campus and eco-friendly environment
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are major issues.
- -Administrative processes are consistently difficult and frustrating.
- -Some lecturers do not cover their syllabus effectively.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often deemed unsatisfactory.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas, notably Location and Value, both near the top of the rankings. Professors and Student Life also score highly, indicating a positive academic and social experience. However, Facilities and Accommodations present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Internationality falls in the mid-range, suggesting a moderate global presence.
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong student life, receiving a high rating of 4.67. Location is also a notable strength, scoring 4.4. Conversely, the facilities received the lowest score at 3.9. Other areas like professors, internationality, and value are rated positively in the low to mid 4s, with accommodation also performing well at 4.
Examining the provided ratings, the university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.75. **Value** also scores highly at 4.05. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the most significant area for improvement, with a rating of 2.55. Other categories like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation fall within a moderate range, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those aspects.
Nothing to show
Student feedback indicates a well-rounded university experience. The strongest area highlighted is **Student Life** with a rating of 4.5, followed closely by **Location** at 4.43. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score at 4.0, presenting the most significant area for potential improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value received solid ratings between 4.1 and 4.25.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive learning environments, dedicated lecturers, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~3.7%) mentions administrative delays and infrastructure issues.
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
With a 4.18/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive, inclusive atmosphere and accessible, caring professors. A small amount of feedback (~18%) noted issues with international office management.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, peers, and overall satisfaction. The average rating is 3.9/5.
Nothing to show
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the supportive faculty, good academic atmosphere, and campus environment. Some mention administrative delays and placement support as minor concerns.
Nothing to show
The University of Benin is a stellar institution that gathers great minds from all backgrounds and fields of life. What resonates with me the most about my alma mater is that the environment spurs learning and promotes healthy competition among students. I didn’t like the incessant strikes while I was a student. They distorted academic activities and made learning rushed after it ended. I recommend UNIBEN as it is an environment that is safe, non-discriminatory and fosters learning.
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
Nothing to show
I did my undergrad in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science here, graduated in 2022. Pros: good research, great facilities, good programmes, completely free tuition, inexpensive accommodation + allowance, flexibility in course choice, wide material coverage, all pros of Korea (e.g. safety, convenient travelling) Cons: strict attendance, some lectures of poor quality, competition and relative grading, hard to make local friends/connections, all cons of Korea (e.g. no English whatsoever outside campus) The school is very much research-oriented, with lots and lots of great resources and facilities to do research. So if you want to do a research graduate or post-graduate course here and you like a particular programme, this is definitely a good place for you. That said, most profs are good researches, not necessarily good educators. University-wide policy is that every course essential for degree completion is taught in English. Thus, with a few exceptions in Humanities, and some very obscure courses, you won't have to learn Korean. The professors had to learn English though. And despite that most of them have lived for a certain period of time in the US, some really struggle to teach in English. In worst cases it will come down to the professor simply reading the slides in the lecture. Couple that with a strict attendance policy, you get a pure torture. On a positive note, most of the newly coming young profs are not like that. Lab/research experience is also very different across different professors. Some are complete grind where you only do what professor tells you to do, and end up working 55+ hours a week. Some are nice and cheerful productive environments where you can even have your name on the authors list of couple papers being an undergrad, and enjoy the research process throughout. The courses choice is wide and the programme is really flexible about what you do. This is especially true for larger departments like the School of Electrical Engineering - which is in fact, called "School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering" in Korean, and I don't even know why the word Electrical is even there - you won't get to learn anything like High Power Electrics. Depending on a course, the amount of theory and hands-on differs significantly from completely theoretical courses to labs with almost zero theory taught. Overall, I would like to get slightly more hands-on experience, but it was alright. The material coverage is on a very good balance in between breadth and depth. Perhaps, it's trying to get both breadth and depth, which results in a relatively high workload. And this high workload is something that is partly fuelled by all grading being done relatively. For example, to get an A, you don't have to score 90% - you have to be roughly above avg + 1 stddev of the normalised score distribution in your group. This encourages some instructors and assistants to either make the workload extremely high, or make the exams extremely difficult just for the sake of difficulty, or both. Yet, if you don't care too much about your grades, but still keep studying, it's hard to fail a particular course. Social life is something that is difficult to have in KAIST if you are an international student. 90% of the students are Korean, and most of them feel shy to/don't really want to reach out to international students. Reaching out to those people yourself will rarely help. Out of the remaining students most are not too much into socialising. What are the chances that you'll like the remaining few? Most clubs are also primarily Korean with all their activities conducted in Korean. Should be somewhat easier if you speak Korean, but not necessarily as easy as it would be elsewhere in the world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show