The John Naisbitt University vs University of Turin vs University of Craiova vs Covenant University vs Stirling Management School
Side-by-side comparison from 138 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical experience through internships
- +Engaging lectures and seminars
- +Supportive faculty and professors
- +Strong academic programs with up-to-date content and knowledgeable professors
- +Ample opportunities for personal and professional development, including research and study abroad
- +Excellent facilities and an engaging student life with diverse extracurricular activities
- +Helpful and dedicated professors
- +Valuable student opportunities and international programs
- +Well-structured and understandable curriculum
- +Holistic student development and personal growth
- +Strong emphasis on spiritual growth and relationship with God
- +Academic excellence and preparation for the corporate world
- +Dedicated faculty and strong academic programs
- +Beautiful campus and excellent sports facilities
- +Wholesome university life with diverse community and resources
- +Strong academics and quality education
- +Supportive faculty and environment
- +Good career opportunities and skill development
Nothing to show
- -Declining academic quality and poor career prospects.
- -Administrative and organizational disorganization
- -Poorly structured and transparent oral examinations
- -Outdated facilities and teaching methods
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -lack of clarity in course structure and grading
- -Restricted academic freedom and outdated educational approaches.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support frustrate many.
- -Poor administration and communication create unnecessary difficulties.
- -Ineffective or biased faculty and poor paper valuation.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues.
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are performing at the lowest possible level. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses, as all areas present an equal and concerning lack of positive performance.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths and areas for potential improvement. The location receives the highest marks, suggesting a desirable setting. Student life and professors also garner strong positive feedback. However, accommodation presents the lowest rating, indicating it is the weakest area evaluated. Internationality and facilities fall within the mid-range, while value is rated favorably.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving the highest rating. Professors also perform exceptionally well. Conversely, the Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a moderate range, while Internationality and Value present further opportunities for growth.
Overall, university ratings indicate a strong showing in value, which stands out as the highest-rated category. Professors and location also received positive marks. Conversely, student life and accommodation appear to be the areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and location, both scoring a perfect 5. Student life and internationality are also very strong, each rated at 4.67. Professors, accommodation, and value for money are consistently rated well, all around 4.33. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its strongest areas being tangible resources and its welcoming global environment.
Across various metrics, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, internationality is identified as a relative weakness, scoring lower than other aspects. Other categories, including facilities, accommodation, and value, also received commendable scores.
Nothing to show
One positive review highlights practical experience and internships, while one negative review points to declining lecture quality and perceived poor graduate employability. Sentiment is split, with approximately 50% of feedback being negative.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting updated programs, engaging professors, and modern facilities. Some negative feedback (~6.4%) mentions disorganization and less transparent exam formats.
Positive feedback (~100%) highlights empathetic professors and detailed, flexible courses. Students also appreciate the opportunities offered, despite some facilities being older.
Reviews indicate ~98.4% positive sentiment, highlighting holistic development, spiritual growth, and academic excellence. A small portion (~1.6%) of feedback raised concerns about restricted freedom and educational focus.
With a ~100% positive rating averaging 4.33/5, student feedback highlights dedicated faculty and a stunning campus with excellent facilities. Some mention a focus on self-learning at the Master's level, which may differ from prior experiences.
With a 4.07/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~87% of students praise strong academics, supportive faculty, and good career opportunities. A small portion, ~7%, noted issues with infrastructure or administration.
Nothing to show
Back then (in my student days) John Naisbitt University was Megatrend University. I graduated from Faculty of business studies and as years were passing by I realized that quality of lectures, seminars and exams significantly dropped off, to the point where I was aware that it is going to be really difficult to continue with a career. Nowadays employers skip most of CVs with John Naisbitt graduates because they know that quality of their knowledge is weak and working habits are bad. For instance, 8 out of 10 John Naisbitt graduates, including myself got their internship/job because of their relatives, cousins or even friends with influence. Unfortunately, this is the way things are going in Serbia. I would highly recommend for fresh students to skip John Naisbitt University because private universities in Serbia are not being controlled by the government and their goal is just to "produce" graduates. However, faculties of the Belgrade University and the University of Novi Sad give really strong basis to graduates and employers around the world know that these students got their marks by hard work and commitment.
It's a great university with a stimulating environment, but the lack of organization at times creates a feeling of hopelessness and lack of motivation. Despite the opportunities available, such as Erasmus, conferences, and supplementary courses, there's little awareness and limited interest from professors in conveying passion. Student organizations offer little support, which negatively impacts students. It would be desirable to increase meeting opportunities to better develop ideas and suggestions, also to effectively convey the message to decision-makers and keep them informed.
Nothing to show
Covenant University is a birthplace for Kings and Queens, it is a top class university in West Africa and top 3 in Nigeria. I loved the serene, modest and impactful environment. We were thought how to dress, speak, act and address people and our community in general. The university environment is very pleasing as compared to other universities in my country. Some things I didn’t like about the university were some strict policies which as growing adults would pose as a burden. This include the extreme spirituality, limited time to one’s personal growth e.t.c. Covenant University is a 101 % recommendation for me as a choice in tertiary education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
