Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 208 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting study options
- +Engaging courses and intellectually stimulating curriculum
- +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Beautiful campus and international student environment
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Supportive and career-focused professors
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student stress.
- -Lack of support, career counseling, and assistance with internships/jobs is a major drawback.
- -Quality of studies and academic support varies greatly by department, with some being subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably Location, scoring a remarkable 4.62. Internationality and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.23. Facilities and Student Life received moderate scores around 3.7, while Professors were rated positively at approximately 4.1.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also received a very high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest score, though still above average. Other strong points include **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all of which are well-regarded. **Location** is also a positive, albeit slightly lower than the other commendable aspects.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Internationality** (4.6) and **Location** (4.4). Ratings for **Facilities** (4.208), **Professors** (4.2), and **Value** (4.28) are also solid. Areas with slightly lower scores include **Accomodation** (4.083) and **Student Life** (3.84).
With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 43 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise rigorous and well-structured programs with knowledgeable professors and a broad curriculum. Some mention administrative disorganization and language barriers with certain staff.
Approximately 77% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, helpful professors, and a good international community. A small percentage mention a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~92%), with students highlighting helpful professors, a strong community, and practical learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~0%) was negative.
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.
