INSA Rouen Normandie vs Graduate School of Engineering - ESIGELEC vs University Of Rouen vs emlyon business school vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 115 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Excellent training, generalist and varied approach
- +Supportive and competent international teachers with practical courses
- +Diverse and inclusive environment, strong social and associative life
- +Strong teacher-student relationships and valuable learning experiences
- +Welcoming and diverse campus community with opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Engaging academic content and extensive campus activities
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +High-quality teaching and relevant, practical programs
- +Strong student support and career development resources
- +International environment and diverse student body
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of depth in courses.
- -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside solid ratings for professors and overall value. Student life and facilities also receive favorable assessments. The university's internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, though still within a generally positive range.
This institution receives exceptionally strong marks for its Professors and Student Life, both earning a near-perfect 4.8. Value for money also scores very highly at 4.8. The weakest area, though still solid, is Facilities at 4.0. Other areas like Location, Accomodation, and Internationality are well-regarded, with ratings between 4.2 and 4.4.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.26), and **Location** (4.22). Facilities and value also receive solid marks. The weakest area, while still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.52). Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience with distinct advantages in fostering an international and engaging student community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives highly positive feedback (~100% of reviews are 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.6/5. Recurring praise highlights excellent training, supportive teachers, and a diverse, adaptable environment. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent teachers and a valuable learning experience, with a friendly and diverse campus environment. Some mention issues with building condition and communication.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
~94% of 52 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teaching, professors, and career preparation. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show