Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs University of Notre Dame vs Qassim University vs King Saud University - KSU

Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Notre Dame (4.40)
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 1/7 categories
Cracow University of Technology - PK: wins 1/7 categories
University of Notre Dame: wins 5/7 categories
Qassim University: wins 0/7 categories
King Saud University - KSU: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Francis of Assisi College Taguig Campus - SFAC: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Notre Dame, United States
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4.00
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
4.27
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.17
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.80
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.06
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
3.83
4.31
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Student life
4.17
4.27
Win
3.89
Not rated
3.80
2.67
Not rated
Value
4.17
4.31
4.78
Win
Not rated
3.60
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.60
Win
4.00
4.14
Not rated
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
  • +Practical and up-to-date courses with opportunities for hands-on learning
  • +Passionate and helpful professors with real-world experience
  • +Friendly environment fostering personal and academic growth
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment for personal growth and belonging
  • +Rigorous academics with high-caliber professors fostering critical thinking and career skills
  • +Strong sense of school pride and vibrant social life

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Good student environment and administration
  • +Variety of courses and programs
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor management and unqualified staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and academic guidance.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.

This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly Internationality and Value, both scoring a high 4.31. Facilities and Student Life are also very strong, averaging 4.27. Professors and Location are well-regarded at 4.06 and 4.17 respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation at a 4.0 rating.

This institution garners particularly high marks for its Value, with an impressive score of 4.78. Professors and Internationality are also areas of significant strength, both receiving a 4.67 rating. Conversely, Student Life received the lowest rating at 3.89, indicating it is the area with the most room for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are rated favorably.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving a solid 4-star rating. Internationality also scores well at 4 stars. Conversely, value for money appears to be the area needing the most improvement, with a rating of 3.6. Professors and student life are rated favorably, though not reaching the highest marks.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.

With 14 out of 17 reviews being positive (~82%), students praise practical, up-to-date courses and a friendly, supportive environment. Professors and staff are described as helpful and passionate.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight a welcoming environment, opportunities for personal growth, and strong academic preparation.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the diverse learning environment, passionate faculty, and welcoming campus community. Limited negative feedback is not emphasized.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
71%
24%
44%
0%
20%
33%
0%
4★
0%
59%
56%
0%
60%
0%
0%
3★
14%
18%
0%
0%
20%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Mixed Journey, but Worth It in the End

My time at this university was a mix of good and not-so-good. Academically, some professors were amazing — passionate, helpful, and genuinely cared about students doing well. Others, not so much. A few courses felt outdated or overly theoretical without much real-world application. The campus itself was decent — not the most modern, but it had everything we needed. Admin stuff could be frustrating at times (long response times, unclear processes), but I think that’s common in a lot of places. What I appreciated most were the people — I met some really smart and motivated classmates who pushed me to do better. Group work, student clubs, and random hallway conversations were honestly where I learned the most. Overall, the university gave me a solid foundation, even if there were things that could be improved. I came out with more confidence, better skills, and some lifelong friendships — and I think that’s what really matters.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close