EAE Business School vs EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs OBS Business School vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB
Side-by-side comparison from 733 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Expert tutors and practical, applicable knowledge
- +Comprehensive curriculum and flexible learning options
- +Engaging and interactive learning environment
- +Career impact and professional development opportunities
- +Transformative personal growth and future clarification
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +Strong business programs with real-world application
- +Engaging professors and challenging coursework
- +Networking opportunities and appealing study location
- +Excellent faculty expertise and professor support
- +Accessible digital resources and student services
- +Pleasant campus environment and connectivity
- +Inspiring professors with professional experience
- +Excellent academic programs and practical teaching style
- +Ideal Barcelona location and international atmosphere
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The quality of education is criticized for being superficial and not job-preparatory.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant inconvenience.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of promised program focus are disappointing.
- -Lack of flexibility and arbitrary grading create a poor learning experience.
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor educational quality
- -Perceived as a for-profit institution rather than a school
- -Ineffective learning environment and useless forum structure
- -Poor teaching quality and negative teacher interactions.
- -Substandard housing conditions and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic support and administrative issues.
- -Administrative & management issues create inefficiency and a feeling of being undervalued.
- -Inconsistent student background levels dilute specialized discussions and course demands.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, achieving a score of 3.82. Conversely, its weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Professor quality, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent but not outstanding profile across the board.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with location emerging as its standout feature, achieving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality also received highly favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation represents the area with the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
This institution presents a largely consistent performance across several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all received a solid 2.5 rating, indicating a generally positive experience. The strongest aspect appears to be value, scoring a 3. Conversely, student life is the weakest area, rated at 2, suggesting room for improvement in that regard.
Across various metrics, the university demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in Student Life (4.23) and Value (4.00). Internationality also scores well at 3.98. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.67, though Facilities (3.90), Professors (3.83), and Location (3.83) also received solid, above-average scores.
Across various metrics, the university garners solid to excellent feedback. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.55. Areas like Facilities (4.10) and Student Life (4.02) also received favorable scores. Conversely, Accomodation (3.64) and Internationality (3.63) represent the weakest points, though still within a respectable range.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
Approximately 65% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable skills, multicultural environments, and expert tutors. A smaller portion, around 13%, expresses concerns regarding class depth and administrative responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4.48/5 from 126 reviews, ~97.6% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise transformative programs, excellent teachers, and valuable career opportunities. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with administration and program delivery.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting good educational foundations and opportunities. However, about 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing issues with teaching quality and program recognition.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, useful resources, and a pleasant campus environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) expresses dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty interaction.
~83% of 124 reviews are positive, praising professors, organization, and international atmosphere. Negative feedback, representing ~1.6%, cites administrative inefficiency and program quality concerns.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
I am deeply disappointed with my experience at EAE Business School. I regret wasting both my time and money on this institution, and I feel compelled to share my experience to help others avoid making the same mistake. First and foremost, it is evident that students' concerns and issues are not a priority for EAE. The administration's lack of response and follow-up on critical matters is appalling. I have had to chase them multiple times for essential documents, and even then, they failed to deliver. For instance, I needed an academic confirmation for my visa renewal. Despite my persistent efforts and numerous emails, I have yet to receive this crucial document. Their standard response is a simple "okay," but no real action is taken, leaving students in limbo. Academically, the situation is equally disheartening. Although I was enrolled in an English-taught program, I can confidently say that at least 90% of the professors lacked proficiency in English. Their inability to communicate effectively and convey the course material was a significant barrier to learning. Moreover, it seemed that many of the instructors lacked the necessary knowledge and expertise in their respective fields. It appears that the hiring standards at EAE do not prioritize the academic qualifications or language skills of their faculty, which severely undermines the quality of education provided. The overall environment at EAE feels more like a daycare center than a reputable business school. The lack of professionalism, coupled with inadequate academic support, makes it clear that the institution does not take the education of its students seriously. The administration's disregard for students' needs and the subpar teaching quality make it impossible to recommend this school to anyone. In conclusion, attending EAE Business School has been a colossal waste of time and money. If you value your time, money, and education, I strongly advise you to look elsewhere. Do not make the mistake of enrolling in this institution.
From a purely academic perspective, the experience is great. The professors are super good and the small class sizes really make the learning experience very personalised. The program has been carefully curated to be relevant and is very practical - I feel like I am learning things I would actually use in my professional career. Apart from this, the students come from really different backgrounds and cultures and it really helps you learn more about how things are different in other countries. Overall, it's been a fantastic experience so far and I highly recommend it!
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
It's embarrassing that they call themselves a school. They're a company that wants to take your money without providing any education nor a recognized degree. The "teachers" are businessmen without any teaching qualification and without the know-how, the classes were boring and the forum structure is pointless. Save yourself and study somewhere else!
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
My journey at Pompeu Fabra has been nothing short of inspiring. The university's emphasis on research and real-world application ignited a fire within me to explore my field in depth. My professors were more than just educators; they were passionate mentors who challenged me to think critically and independently. The vibrant energy of Barcelona, combined with the university's international focus, created an environment where I felt both stimulated and supported. UPF has equipped me with a robust skill set and a global perspective, preparing me to make a meaningful impact on the world.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
