GBSB Global Business School vs IE University vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 341 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Engaging professors with deep knowledge and professional experience
- +Supportive and motivating environment with career guidance
- +Strong international and interdisciplinary community
- +Practical, real-world learning and professional faculty
- +Active campus life and cultural experience
- +Comprehensive and complementary degree programmes
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +strong academic quality and practical focus
- +welcoming and supportive community
- +multicultural and global perspective
- +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Marketing promises do not align with academic reality.
- -Program management is problematic and inflexible.
- -The campus environment lacks traditional college experience aspects.
- -Low English proficiency of professors and lack of care for Erasmus students.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This institution garners considerable praise, particularly in its **Internationality**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Location** also stands out as a significant strength. Conversely, **Accommodations** represent the lowest-rated aspect among the surveyed areas. Other categories such as **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** all received solid, positive evaluations, indicating a well-rounded experience overall.
Academically and experientially, this institution receives solid marks. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, scoring close to 3.9. Student life and value also present favorably. However, accommodation and internationality stand out as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects to match the university's otherwise strong performance.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
An overall assessment reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Location and Professors received particularly high marks, with Facilities and Value also scoring well. Student Life and Internationality demonstrate respectable performance. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, indicating a need for improvement.
This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, international environments, and strong networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic rigor and the campus experience.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning and faculty expertise. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions low English proficiency from professors and a lack of organization.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nearly all 52 reviews are positive, with ~74% praising high academic quality, excellent faculty and facilities, and a welcoming community. The campus environment and practical learning are also frequently highlighted. No negative reviews were submitted.
Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.
Nothing to show
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
