Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs UIC Barcelona vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School vs Rovira i Virgili University - URV
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and helpful teaching/tutoring team
- +High academic quality and practical projects
- +Welcoming community and positive student experience
- +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
Nothing to show
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
- -Lack of support for internships and poor handling of student complaints are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent staff behavior and a general lack of positive aspects make students unhappy.
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas. Its location, professors, and value are particularly strong, all receiving ratings above 4.36. Student life and facilities also score well, with averages around 4.2. The university's internationality is rated at nearly 4. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a considerably lower 3.32.
This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.
Among surveyed metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **location** also score favorably. While **facilities** and **value** are solid, **accommodation** emerges as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
~100% of 54 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.31/5. Students highlight quality materials, responsive help, and feeling supported throughout their learning.
Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.
With a 4.57/5 average rating from 44 reviews, approximately 95% of feedback is positive, praising supportive, knowledgeable lecturers and practical courses in a multicultural environment. A small minority of ~5% reported issues with staff helpfulness and internship support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
Nothing to show
