Qatar University vs College of the North Atlantic Qatar vs Hamad bin Khalifa University vs Bristol Business School vs CUC Ulster University - CUCUU

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Qatar University: wins 1/3 categories
College of the North Atlantic Qatar: wins 0/3 categories
Hamad bin Khalifa University: wins 0/3 categories
Bristol Business School: wins 0/3 categories
CUC Ulster University - CUCUU: wins 1/3 categories
American University of Afghanistan - AUAF: wins 1/3 categories
Tecmilenio University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Bristol, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Mexico City, Mexico
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
3.00
4.60
Win
Not rated
Location
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Professors
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.90
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Student life
3.30
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
3.60
Not rated
Value
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
5.00
4.80
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
3.75
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic programs and high-quality education
  • +Valuable practical experience and real-life projects
  • +Strong reputation, numerous opportunities, and qualified faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +engaging classes and good research resources
  • +excellent facilities and vibrant campus
  • +convenient location and supportive lecturers
  • +Helpful professors and friendly peers
  • +Modern facilities and technological resources
  • +Opportunity for a UK degree in Qatar
  • +World-class education and supportive academic environment
  • +Unwavering commitment to Afghan students during difficult times
  • +Skilled and professional faculty offering assistance and opportunities
  • +Flexible executive plan accommodates work and study
  • +Supportive professors and coordinators
Cons
  • -Exclusionary practices and language barriers
  • -Segregated facilities and programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clarity in curriculum and communication creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -Communication problems and lack of clear information are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of adequate support, both academic and personal, is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in its **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. Facilities and professors also receive very strong marks. However, **student life** presents an area for potential improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Accommodations, internationality, and value are rated favorably, though not reaching the same exceptional levels as location and academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with professors receiving the highest ratings. Facilities and location are also well-regarded, alongside value for money. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are rated consistently well, though they represent the lower end of the provided scores.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably receiving perfect scores for professors, accommodation, internationality, and value. Student life is also highly rated. The weakest aspect is its location, which received zero points. Facilities, while not perfect, still scored a respectable 3.

This institution garners exceptional scores in key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities also score very highly. Conversely, student life and location present the most modest ratings, falling below the university's otherwise impressive average. Accommodations and overall value are rated positively, aligning with the general strong performance.

This institution shines in two key areas: receiving top marks for its professors and its value. Conversely, the university faces significant challenges, with facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all receiving the lowest possible ratings. Its internationality is a mid-range strength, scoring a respectable four out of five.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Seven out of ten reviews are positive, with students praising academic quality, opportunities, and practical learning. One review expressed concerns about exclusion due to language and program segregation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the quality of education and engaging classes. Facilities, clubs, and the vibrant campus environment are frequently highlighted.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students praise the university's fun atmosphere, helpful professors and peers, and good facilities. The prospect of a new campus and earning a UK degree in Qatar are highlights.

All five reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight the world-class education and supportive environment, especially appreciating the university's commitment to Afghan students during difficult times.

The sole review is highly positive, with ~100% of feedback rating 5/5. Students highlight the flexibility of executive programs and supportive professors/coordinators. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
4★
30%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close