Universitatea de Medicina si Farm 'Carol Davila' - UMFCD - UMFCD vs University of Bucharest - UB vs Hyperion University - UHB vs Universitatea Bioterra București vs Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hyperion University - UHB (5.00)
Universitatea de Medicina si Farm 'Carol Davila' - UMFCD - UMFCD: wins 0/4 categories
University of Bucharest - UB: wins 0/4 categories
Hyperion University - UHB: wins 4/4 categories
Universitatea Bioterra București: wins 0/4 categories
Ecological University of Bucharest - UEB: wins 0/4 categories
Kepler University: wins 0/4 categories
National University of Arts Bucharest - UNArte: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Mathematics
Bucharest, Romania
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Bucharest, Romania
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Fine Art
Category ratings
Facilities
2.81
3.45
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.51
4.66
5.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.37
4.14
5.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.79
3.66
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.94
4.08
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.50
Value
4.07
4.08
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
3.37
3.32
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Abundant clinical practice opportunities
  • +Accessible information and resources
  • +Excellent faculty and learning opportunities
  • +Positive social experience and friendships
  • +Dedicated academic environment
  • +Helpful and supportive teachers
  • +Excellent teaching quality

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
  • +Positive overall student experience

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Welcoming and respectful environment
  • +Exceptional teaching and international perspectives
Cons
  • -Poor administrative support and communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring issue.
  • -Lack of essential resources and insufficient academic support negatively impact learning.
  • -Professors' lack of care and inconvenient schedules.
  • -Administrative and management issues with scholarships.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of support for student success and academic advising is a concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of support from instructors are recurring problems.
Rating summary
What students say

A look at the university's ratings reveals a strong showing in its location, achieving the highest score. Student life and value also received favorable marks, indicating positive experiences in these aspects. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for improvement. Professor quality, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, reflecting generally satisfactory performance.

Considering the provided metrics, this institution excels in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance. The areas that received lower scores include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every area. Notably, its strengths lie uniformly across facilities, professor quality, location desirability, vibrant student life, accommodation provisions, a high degree of internationality, and exceptional value for money. No specific weaknesses are identified, indicating a consistently excellent experience for students.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.

Nothing to show

Offering a compelling academic experience, this institution excels with perfect scores for its professors and prime location. Students can also expect a vibrant student life and good value for their investment. Areas for potential improvement include its facilities and accommodation, which received solid but not perfect ratings. Internationality is also rated positively, indicating a well-rounded environment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews are positive (~100%), highlighting strong academic programs and clinical practice opportunities. Some mention outdated teaching methods or minor organizational issues, but these are not significant concerns.

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, praising learning opportunities and professional teachers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions uncaring professors and inconvenient scheduling. The average rating is 4.26 out of 5.

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight excellent, helpful teachers. Students appreciate the willingness of instructors to assist and explain course material.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise dedicated teachers and a welcoming atmosphere. Despite some equipment limitations, instructional quality is exceptional.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
100%
0%
67%
0%
50%
4★
43%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
57%
19%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Some great teachers, much frustration

The university is considered one of the finest medical training institutions in the country. Not sure whether because of the quality itself, or the lack of competition. There are some great, dedicated teachers, who are willing to help students and pass down their knowledge but there are at least just as many uninterested, sloppy teachers. One can find great people and future peers, but also a lot of favoritism and toxic competition.

Good practice, a lot of information but not a lot of job opportunities

It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close