Emory University vs Georgia State University vs Clark Atlanta University - CAUB vs The Art Institute of Atlanta vs Spelman College
Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional instructors as mentors and academic supporters
- +Robust academic programs and varied course offerings
- +Comprehensive student support services for well-being and careers
- +Supportive and invested faculty
- +Diverse student body and engaging campus life
- +Abundant opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Empowering atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Excellent professors and approachable faculty support
- +Opportunities for involvement and personal growth
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences
- +Helpful business and real-world application of studies
- +Strong foundational program for career development
- +Inclusive, supportive environment for Black women's excellence
- +Opportunities for involvement in diverse organizations and community service
- +Academic and social encouragement for student success
- +Excellent academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive and welcoming campus environment.
- +Preparation for future professional needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
- -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inadequate resources.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus safety.
- -Ineffective teaching and unhelpful academic advising.
- -None of the provided reviews express negative sentiment or highlight aspects that students appreciate the least.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of sufficient resources and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect with faculty members are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Facilities**, receiving a high rating. Other areas performing very well include **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all above 4.3. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score positively. The **Location**, while still rated well, is the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution receives a robust overall rating. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.43) and Facilities (4.4), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Student Life (4.37) and Internationality (4.26) also score well. The location, however, appears to be the weakest point, with a rating of 4.14, though still positive.
This university receives its highest marks for its Professors, with an impressive 4.56 rating. Student Life also scores well at 4.38, closely followed by Value at 4.30. Conversely, Internationality is its weakest area, rated at 3.63. Facilities and Accomodation are moderately rated, both around 3.88.
This institution receives a well-rounded assessment, with its **professors** standing out as a significant strength at 4.5. The **value** proposition, however, is the lowest rated aspect at 3. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all share a consistent rating of 3.5, indicating a solid, though not exceptional, performance in these areas.
This institution achieves excellent scores in key areas, particularly in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a perfect 5. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are also strong at 4. The **Location** stands out as the weakest point with a rating of 3, while **Value** also garners a perfect 5. Overall, it presents a highly positive academic and social environment, with a slight compromise on its geographical placement.
Across several key areas, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest points include the professors and location, both receiving a high rating of 4.5. Student life, accommodation, and value are also well-regarded, each scoring 4.25. Facilities and internationality are solid with scores of 4, representing the areas with the lowest, though still good, ratings.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise helpful, supportive instructors and excellent academic programs. Minimal negative feedback exists, primarily related to short-lived spring pollen.
With an average rating of 4.28/5, ~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, hands-on learning, and opportunities in Atlanta. One negative review cited incompetence, poor resources, and safety concerns.
Most reviews praise growth opportunities, empowering atmosphere, and excellent professors. A small percentage of feedback notes concerns with campus safety. The average rating is 4.04 out of 5.
Two positive reviews highlight strong foundational skills, enjoyable classes, and helpful business courses, contributing to an average rating of 4/5.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review highlights a strong sense of community and supportive academic environment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars. Students praise strong academic programs, dedicated faculty, and a beneficial learning environment with attractive facilities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show