Emory University vs Georgia Institute of Technology vs Georgia State University vs Clark Atlanta University - CAUB vs Atlanta Technical College
Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional instructors as mentors and academic supporters
- +Robust academic programs and varied course offerings
- +Comprehensive student support services for well-being and careers
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty
- +Inspiring and motivating learning environment
- +Beautiful and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Supportive and invested faculty
- +Diverse student body and engaging campus life
- +Abundant opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Empowering atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Excellent professors and approachable faculty support
- +Opportunities for involvement and personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Inclusive, supportive environment for Black women's excellence
- +Opportunities for involvement in diverse organizations and community service
- +Academic and social encouragement for student success
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
- -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective and uninspiring.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inadequate resources.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus safety.
- -Ineffective teaching and unhelpful academic advising.
- -None of the provided reviews express negative sentiment or highlight aspects that students appreciate the least.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a problem.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Facilities**, receiving a high rating. Other areas performing very well include **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all above 4.3. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score positively. The **Location**, while still rated well, is the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution demonstrates strong performance across several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, achieving a high score of 4.66. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received excellent marks, both exceeding 4.5. The university's **Accomodation** is its lowest-rated category, scoring 4.38. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Value are rated consistently well, generally falling between 4.45 and 4.47.
This institution receives a robust overall rating. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.43) and Facilities (4.4), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Student Life (4.37) and Internationality (4.26) also score well. The location, however, appears to be the weakest point, with a rating of 4.14, though still positive.
This university receives its highest marks for its Professors, with an impressive 4.56 rating. Student Life also scores well at 4.38, closely followed by Value at 4.30. Conversely, Internationality is its weakest area, rated at 3.63. Facilities and Accomodation are moderately rated, both around 3.88.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores in key areas, particularly in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a perfect 5. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are also strong at 4. The **Location** stands out as the weakest point with a rating of 3, while **Value** also garners a perfect 5. Overall, it presents a highly positive academic and social environment, with a slight compromise on its geographical placement.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise helpful, supportive instructors and excellent academic programs. Minimal negative feedback exists, primarily related to short-lived spring pollen.
Students overwhelmingly praise the university's excellent programs and supportive faculty, with ~97% of feedback being positive. They highlight strong academic rigor, accessible staff, and a beautiful, well-maintained campus. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.28/5, ~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, hands-on learning, and opportunities in Atlanta. One negative review cited incompetence, poor resources, and safety concerns.
Most reviews praise growth opportunities, empowering atmosphere, and excellent professors. A small percentage of feedback notes concerns with campus safety. The average rating is 4.04 out of 5.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review highlights a strong sense of community and supportive academic environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show