University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV
Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
- +Accessible location and good transportation links
- +Ample facilities available
- +Accessible and flexible for working students
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Modern facilities and engaging courses
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Helpful and supportive teachers
- +Excellent teaching quality
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Focus on environmental awareness and commitment
- +Positive overall student experience
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support for student success and academic advising is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are persistent problems.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every area. Notably, its strengths lie uniformly across facilities, professor quality, location desirability, vibrant student life, accommodation provisions, a high degree of internationality, and exceptional value for money. No specific weaknesses are identified, indicating a consistently excellent experience for students.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with high marks of 4.67. Conversely, Location and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, both at 3.33. Professors and Value are rated well, at 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience with academics and affordability.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight excellent, helpful teachers. Students appreciate the willingness of instructors to assist and explain course material.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight helpful faculty and a positive learning environment.
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
