Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA vs Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB

Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Cema - UCEMA (5.00)
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 1/6 categories
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Administration
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
4.25
4.50
3.33
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.80
3.67
4.50
4.08
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.20
4.25
4.00
3.83
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.80
4.13
5.00
2.75
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.60
Win
4.33
4.50
3.60
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.80
4.63
4.50
3.75
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.80
4.50
4.50
3.27
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Supportive staff and comfortable facilities
  • +High-quality education and valuable peer connections
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money
  • +Strong academic programs with industry-experienced professors
  • +Flexible schedules supporting work-study balance
  • +Good job prospects and practical preparation for the professional market
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Poor management and communication, particularly concerning administrative tasks.
  • -Outdated curriculum and overly long program duration.
  • -Unattractive facilities and uninspiring campus environment.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in accommodation, receiving a high rating of 4.5, and particularly excels in value for money, scoring an impressive 4.625. Student life also garners exceptional feedback at 4.33. Conversely, the location presents the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this area compared to its other well-regarded features.

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

This institution receives its highest marks for location, followed closely by professors and value. Conversely, its internationality rating is notably the lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores, while student life achieved a respectable standing.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students value the concrete teaching approach combining theory and practical application, excellent curricular level, and supportive staff and peers.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education and job prospects, often with experienced professors. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing outdated curricula, poor management, and unappealing infrastructure.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
36%
100%
29%
0%
0%
33%
4★
23%
64%
0%
36%
50%
0%
33%
3★
23%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
33%
2★
0%
0%
0%
7%
50%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close