Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Constant administrative support and efficient problem resolution
- +Modern, comfortable, and well-organized campus facilities
- +Valuable practical experience through industry connections and real-world projects
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
- +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
- +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
- +Positive and well-structured learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
- +Professional, dedicated teachers
- +Enriching, supportive learning environment
- -Lack of updated and functional facilities.
- -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration and management.
- -Inconsistent and unclear academic policies and support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
- -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
- -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback from its students. Its strongest areas of performance are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are also highly rated, demonstrating excellent physical resources and living conditions. **Professors** represent the weakest area, though still scoring a commendable 4.43, indicating that while teaching quality is good, it's not as exceptional as other aspects. Student life and internationality are well-received, reflecting a vibrant and diverse campus experience.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.
~74% of reviews praise consistent support, modern facilities, and valuable industry experience. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.
Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.
Nothing to show
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
