RMIT University vs Swinburne University of Technology vs Monash University vs Victoria University vs Melbourne Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 248 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skills emphasis
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for electives, exchange programs, and work-integrated learning
- +Excellent faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus environment
- +Strong support services and personal development opportunities
- +Engaging online lectures and flexible learning options
- +Supportive lecturers and strong networking opportunities
- +Convenient campus location and quiet study spaces
- +Life-changing educational experience and career readiness
- +Supportive community and valuable peer connections
- +Excellent study environment and resources
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment, supportive staff and professors
- +Strong emphasis on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Blend of modern teaching with traditional values
- +Hands-on learning & accommodating staff
- +Large campus
- +Limited post-graduation options
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Teachers are unhelpful and actively work against students' success.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Underwhelming and outdated course content with a lack of practical application.
- -Limited career opportunities and support services as advertised.
- -Perceived cost-cutting measures impacting essential program components.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Limited course variety and a disconnect between curriculum and real-world application are also noted.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Inflexible course structures and unsupportive teaching staff are prevalent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of basic amenities are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. Its **Facilities** and **Value** also receive very positive marks. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in global reach and its physical setting.
This university receives high marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.49)** and **Professors (4.48)**. Facilities and Student Life also score well, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Value for money is rated favorably at 4.25.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.29. **Location** and **Accomodation** also received favorable ratings around 4.1. The **Professors** were rated positively at 4.11. **Facilities** earned a solid score of 4. **Student Life** emerged as the relatively weakest area, with a rating of 3.82.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its only slight deviation from a perfect score is in location, which still garners a very respectable rating. The university's strengths are clearly in its comprehensive offerings and student experience.
Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, student life emerges as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting potential for improvement in campus engagement and activities. Other aspects like facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all fall within a generally positive range, with value and internationality scoring particularly well.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its professors, who received a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all scored a solid 4 out of 5, indicating a well-rounded university experience. The weakest area appears to be value, which scored a 3, suggesting a slight concern in this regard compared to other aspects.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, good teaching quality, and diverse electives. A small percentage of feedback expressed concerns about faculty.
The vast majority of reviews are positive (~93%), highlighting knowledgeable faculty, excellent facilities, and diverse programs. A small portion of feedback (~3.5%) mentions cost-cutting, underwhelming course content, and a lack of practical application.
With a 4.29/5 average rating from 28 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and engaging online sessions. The block study method and flexible attendance are also highlighted as beneficial.
With an average rating of 5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight life-changing experiences, strong support systems, quality education, and career readiness. They also appreciate university events, study spaces, and library resources.
With ~86% positive feedback, students praise inclusivity, supportive staff, and relevant coursework, highlighting strong workforce connections. Some note a less prominent student culture but are grateful for opportunities.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university is positively received. The single review highlighted enjoyable hands-on course content and a large campus with accommodating staff.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
They are thugs. Don't ever go to them. The teachers are part of the cartel who do not help students to let them fail and earn millions of dollars. Infrastructure is the best but the teachers are the worst.
The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Bachelor of Speech Pathology at ACU and loving it! The program is structured so you have optimal practical learning that correlates with the theory. All of the content is relevant to Speech Pathology practice. There are also so many job opportunities available once you graduate.
Nothing to show
