Charles Sturt University vs Torrens University Australia vs University of Technology Sydney vs University of New England vs Learning People

Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Technology Sydney (4.30)
Charles Sturt University: wins 0/7 categories
Torrens University Australia: wins 0/7 categories
University of Technology Sydney: wins 3/7 categories
University of New England: wins 3/7 categories
Learning People: wins 0/7 categories
Australian Adult Learning Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich College: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Best programme: Art and Design
Armidale, Australia
4.20
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Dublin, Ireland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Sydney, Australia
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.59
3.38
4.53
Win
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
3.77
3.63
4.58
Win
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.11
3.38
4.32
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Internationality
3.76
3.50
4.37
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.82
3.00
4.32
Win
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.93
3.38
4.26
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.73
3.17
3.88
4.05
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging and diverse academic programs
  • +Positive campus environment and growth opportunities
  • +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
  • +Flexible learning options catering to working students
  • +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
  • +Relevant, practical, and high-quality programs
  • +Supportive learning environment and knowledgeable staff
  • +Convenient city location and extensive course options
  • +Flexible and accessible online learning options
  • +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive student services and community focus

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are significant complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
  • -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
  • -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff and administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Overcrowded classes and a perceived lack of academic rigor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its faculty, earning the highest rating for professors. Student life and value for money also received commendable scores. Conversely, facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories, including location, accommodation, and internationality, show solid, mid-range performance.

This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.

This institution garners excellent marks for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and internationality also receive strong ratings around 4.3. While professors and overall value are rated favorably at over 4.2, accommodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.875.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 41 out of 45 reviews being positive, students praise knowledgeable professors and supportive faculty. They highlight growth opportunities, challenging curricula, and vibrant campus life. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.

~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.

University reviews are highly positive, with ~90% praising the valuable engineering degree, convenient city location, and supportive learning environment. Most students highlight practical subjects and helpful professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
7%
38%
37%
29%
0%
0%
0%
4★
84%
25%
53%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
11%
5%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Torrens university

I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close