Macquarie University vs The University of Newcastle vs Charles Sturt University vs Torrens University Australia vs University of New England
Side-by-side comparison from 107 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality facilities and learning environments
- +Engaging and well-taught courses
- +Supportive and accommodating academic staff
- +Excellent teaching and lecturer support
- +Abundant and practical facilities
- +Opportunities for valuable student experiences
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Engaging and diverse academic programs
- +Positive campus environment and growth opportunities
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +Flexible and accessible online learning options
- +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
- +Supportive student services and community focus
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including delayed results and enrollment difficulties.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful or rude staff interactions, particularly in IT.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of transparency are frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are significant complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Professors** receiving the highest marks. The **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in student housing. **Student Life** also received a moderate rating.
Professors receive a perfect score, marking the university's strongest attribute. Areas needing improvement include Student Life and Accomodation, both scoring 3.5. Facilities and Value are also highly regarded, achieving 4.25. Internationality scores a respectable 3.75, while Location is rated at 4. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in academic and practical offerings, with student experience aspects indicating room for enhancement.
This institution demonstrates particular strength in its faculty, earning the highest rating for professors. Student life and value for money also received commendable scores. Conversely, facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories, including location, accommodation, and internationality, show solid, mid-range performance.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising facilities, teaching quality, and helpful staff. A small percentage (~6.9%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with administrative processes and staff interactions.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight ample resources, professional and flexible teaching, good facilities, and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.
With 41 out of 45 reviews being positive, students praise knowledgeable professors and supportive faculty. They highlight growth opportunities, challenging curricula, and vibrant campus life. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am happy with my choice of Macquarie University for my Bachelor's degree. My major in screen production has allowed me to explore practically every element of filmmaking possible. If you were looking to focus on very specific areas of study, I would perhaps look elsewhere. But for someone who has an interest in the field and isn't sure what they want to do, I have found the university opens your eyes to a world of possibilities. The campus is beautiful and easily accessible and makes an effort to create a sense of community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
