University of Birmingham vs Aston University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Birmingham City University vs The University of Law

Side-by-side comparison from 448 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Global Banking School (5.00)
University of Birmingham: wins 0/7 categories
Aston University: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/7 categories
Birmingham City University: wins 0/7 categories
The University of Law: wins 0/7 categories
Aston Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
181 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
96 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
122 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.37
4.24
4.44
Win
4.41
4.08
4.14
4.00
Location
4.43
4.44
4.74
Win
4.27
4.46
4.64
4.00
Professors
4.17
4.28
4.75
4.30
4.50
4.29
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.29
4.32
4.60
4.26
4.79
4.07
5.00
Win
Student life
4.28
4.31
4.56
Win
4.19
3.92
4.38
4.00
Value
4.04
4.24
4.50
4.13
4.36
4.21
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.93
3.55
4.32
Win
3.95
3.69
4.14
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Beautiful campus and engaging, practical courses.
  • +Excellent, expert teaching and student support.
  • +Well-structured programmes with real-world application.
  • +Excellent teaching, helpful tutors, and comprehensive learning materials.
  • +Strong academic reputation and valued career services.
  • +Engaging courses with a good mix of theory and practical application.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and career preparation
  • +Friendly, knowledgeable, and engaging staff
  • +Vibrant campus life and student involvement opportunities
  • +Dedicated and guiding lecturers
  • +Quality education and modern learning approaches
  • +Flexible study options and support for career development
  • +Practical, real-world curriculum
  • +Focus on personal and leadership development
  • +Supportive learning environment and resources
  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Poor disability and mental health support services.
  • -Inadequate course delivery, including overcrowded lectures and lack of seminars.
  • -Mismanagement of student organizations and unprofessional lecturer conduct.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of empathy and accessibility problems.
  • -Poor lecturer availability and coordination issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive mentors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are often unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent concern.
  • -Limited resources and lack of essential amenities create difficulties.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong showing across most aspects, the university excels particularly in **Location**, earning the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive very favorable scores. The **Value** proposition is solid, and **Student Life** is well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the area with the most room for improvement, scoring the lowest among the surveyed metrics. **Professors** are rated positively, though slightly below some other categories.

Across several key aspects, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Professors also received high marks. The weakest performing category is Accomodation, registering a notably lower score of 3.55. Overall, the university presents a well-regarded profile, with most areas exceeding a 4.2 rating.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution receives strong praise for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.41. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.30, with **Location** and **Internationality** closely following at 4.27. While **Student Life** and **Value** are solid, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 3.95.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.79, and **Professors**, receiving a solid 4.5. Its **Location** is also well-regarded at 4.46. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.69, indicating a potential area for improvement, while **Student Life** (3.92) and **Facilities** (4.08) are rated moderately. The university offers good **Value** at 4.36.

Examining the university's performance across several key metrics reveals a varied picture. The institution shines particularly brightly in **Location**, receiving the highest score. Conversely, **Internationality** garnered the lowest rating. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received strong scores, indicating a generally positive overall experience, though improvements in international student integration could be beneficial.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~82% positive feedback and an average 4.17/5 rating, students praise beautiful campuses and quality teaching across diverse courses. A small ~1.7% of reviews cite concerns with specific departments or support services.

With ~98% positive feedback, students praise strong teaching, well-organized programs, and helpful tutors. A small minority mention issues with staff empathy and lecture accessibility.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

With a 4.41/5 average rating from 124 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising practical learning and employability. One negative review cited poor teaching quality.

Students praise the university (~93% positive), highlighting dedicated lecturers, quality education, and ample workshops. Guidance and support throughout studies are frequently mentioned. No negative reviews were recorded.

~100% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent curriculum, personal development opportunities, and supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
38%
75%
52%
57%
29%
100%
4★
43%
53%
25%
40%
36%
57%
0%
3★
18%
7%
0%
8%
7%
14%
0%
2★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Employability

I have had a very positive experience in my first year at this university. I have found the staff very friendly, all content very engaging and felt I have been challenged throughout the year. One aspect that is particularly strong is the employability at Aston with all modules focusing on giving students hard skills to increase their employability. Only complaint would be some administrative problems such as delayed exam results and some issues with timetabling at the start of term.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close