London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Henley Business School vs Teesside University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 392 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical application of theory
- +Strong academic programmes and career support
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Accessible and supportive faculty and resources.
- +Practical, industry-focused education and career preparation.
- +Comprehensive facilities and diverse program offerings.
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Passionate and supportive staff fostering happiness and personal drive
- +Emphasis on individual happiness and progress over external pressures
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized.
- -Lack of lecturer and student support
- -Outdated educational facilities and poor subject knowledge from professors
- -Safety concerns regarding crime in the area
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Poor administrative and management support.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in student life and internationality, both receiving high marks. Location and accommodation also score well. However, the university's weakest area is its value for money, which is rated lower than other aspects. Facilities and professors receive solid, above-average scores, indicating general satisfaction across these key areas.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **facilities**, achieving a score of 4.47. Internationality is also a strong point at 4.30, with professors rated well at 4.26. Student life, value, and location also score favorably between 4.09 and 4.17. The area with the lowest rating is **accommodation**, standing at 3.79.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a mixed but generally solid performance in its assessed areas. Its strongest suit is undoubtedly **accommodation**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **student life** emerges as the weakest area, scoring a comparatively low 2.5. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all fall within the moderate range, indicating areas that perform adequately without standing out significantly.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight hands-on learning, strong career preparation, and supportive campus environments. No negative feedback was received.
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong support, excellent facilities, and practical, career-focused education. A small percentage of feedback expresses dissatisfaction with lecturer knowledge and student support.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Reviews are split, with positive feedback highlighting happiness and passion, while negative feedback points to outdated courses and staff lacking industry depth, representing about 50% of the feedback.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The approachable teachers and the facilities are top-notch. The majority of my studies were during COVID-19 so student life can't be assessed. Accommodations in Middlebrough are cheap and very affordable when compared to other places and other universities. The course modules were very helpful except for 3D interactive visualization which I really don't think is applicable as a data scientist and can be replaced with SQL instead.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
