The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Petre Andrei University of Iași vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Dedicated, supportive, and up-to-date faculty
- +Engaging campus life and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Strong career prospects and practical skill development
- +Convenient location and accessible teachers
- +Support for balancing studies with work and other activities
- +Strong technical training and faculty advantages
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors and faculty
- +Positive learning environment
- +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Interactive and interesting courses
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated teaching methods and poor future preparedness
- -Arrogant academic staff
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from faculty and administration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources that hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging and effective teaching methods.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Disorganized curriculum and teaching quality are criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution garners notable praise, particularly for its **Student Life** (4.43) and **Location** (4.35), reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Internationality** (3.67) received the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value also scored well above average.
This institution achieves a perfect score for its **location**, making it a significant draw. However, its **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** all receive moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. The **professors** are a stronger point, earning a solid 4.
This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also seem satisfied with **professors**, **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **facilities**, which are rated at 3.
This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 24 reviews, approximately 79% of students gave positive feedback, praising good teachers, campus life, and job prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~4.2%) cited issues with teaching methods and staff attitude.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. Students are delighted by accessible courses and approachable teachers, recommending the university for flexible learning. No negative feedback was received.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted great professors and a pleasant study experience, particularly in the Faculty of Computer Science. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show