Vilnius University vs Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs ISM University of Management and Economics vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 249 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world learning and business case studies
- +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Practical, applied learning and project-based studies
- +Supportive, kind, and professional teaching staff
- +Strong preparation for the job market
- +Supportive faculty and practical learning
- +Welcoming, diverse, and international campus
- +Accessible student support services
- +Passionate faculty with international, practical experience
- +Strong balance of theory and real-world application
- +Valuable opportunities and networking
- +Practical learning and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
- +Modern facilities and positive study environment
- +Expert and recognized faculty
- +Relevant and modern curriculum
- +Practical business applications
- +Supportive faculty and practical, relevant curriculum
- +Smooth, organized admissions and international student support
- +Modern, English-taught programs focused on practical skills
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support for students is a recurring concern.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -They are frustrated with outdated facilities and technology.
- -Students often face challenges with course structure and content.
- -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor curriculum design and unrealistic project expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and limited course offerings are a recurring issue.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -The university is perceived as too small and lacking in appeal.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent complaints.
Campus feedback indicates a university excelling in several key areas. Location and Value received the highest marks, suggesting strong external and financial appeal. Student Life and Internationality are also highly rated, reflecting a vibrant and globally connected community. Professors are well-regarded, contributing to academic quality. Facilities are rated well, though slightly lower than other academic and social aspects. Accommodations represent the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in student housing.
Considering the provided data, this institution excels in Student Life, boasting a high rating of 4.67. Internationality and Value also receive strong marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the area with the lowest rating at 4.12, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect compared to other evaluated categories.
This institution garners strong marks across most aspects. Internationality stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.432, closely followed by student life at 4.428. Location also received high scores. Accommodation is rated the lowest among the categories, though still a respectable 4.036. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with excellent student engagement and a global outlook.
With exceptionally high marks in several key areas, this institution excels in its **Facilities** (4.83) and **Location** (4.85). **Student Life** (4.76) and **Value** (4.73) also received very positive feedback. **Professors** (4.57) and **Internationality** (4.41) are rated well, though not quite as strongly. The **Accomodation** score (3.31) stands out as the weakest area in the assessment.
Overall, this university receives strong ratings in several key areas. Location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, followed closely by student life and facilities. Internationality also garners a high score. Conversely, accommodation is the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is rated moderately well.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.
This institution receives high marks for its academic offerings, with Professors earning a strong 4.33. Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring a 4. However, areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, both receiving a 3.5 rating. Student Life presents a mixed picture, rated at 3.67, while Location and Internationality fall in the mid-range with 3.83.
Nearly all reviews praise real-world projects and a diverse, friendly student community. A small minority of feedback noted occasional administrative delays or English communication challenges.
With an average rating of 4.54/5 from 13 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students highlight the practical, hands-on curriculum and supportive faculty as key strengths. A few minor points were mentioned regarding class schedules and dorm administration.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting a modern, practical, and highly international education with friendly and organized environments. One review mentioned less support for game development/programming.
With an average rating of 4.73/5 from 37 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the balance of theory and practice, passionate faculty with international experience, and the overall enriching educational experience.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and modern facilities. One negative review mentioned management issues.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a good learning environment, quality of education with practical studies, and helpful international admission support.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
