Universiti Putra Malaysia - UPM vs Egerton University vs Hampden – Sydney College vs Cyprus International University vs International telematic university Uninettuno - UTIU

Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universiti Putra Malaysia - UPM (5.00)
Universiti Putra Malaysia - UPM: wins 2/6 categories
Egerton University: wins 3/6 categories
Hampden – Sydney College: wins 0/6 categories
Cyprus International University: wins 0/6 categories
International telematic university Uninettuno - UTIU: wins 1/6 categories
British Institute of Management and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Free University of Great Lake - FUGL: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Hampden Sydney, Virginia, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.13
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.19
Win
Not rated
4.13
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.48
Not rated
4.30
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
3.98
Not rated
4.40
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.37
Win
Not rated
4.03
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.27
Not rated
4.10
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.86
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Amazing faculty & highly qualified professors
  • +Abundant interactive programs & opportunities
  • +Large campus & strong student life
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Study-friendly environment and resources
  • +Comprehensive program offerings
  • +Flexible and self-paced learning
  • +High-quality education from experienced professors
  • +Innovative metaverse learning experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a lack of responsiveness from staff cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of adequate resources, support, and clear communication is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Value. Student Life, Location, and Internationality also received strong ratings of 4. The primary area for potential improvement, based on the provided scores, is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.

This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.

Nothing to show

Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

This institution demonstrates excellent strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a perfect score. **Internationality** is also a significant highlight. The university performs well in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving solid ratings. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, with a moderate score. **Value** for money is rated positively, indicating a generally good offering across most aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise its amazing faculty, huge campus, and numerous interactive programs and opportunities.

Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.

University reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students appreciate the flexibility and quality of education, citing self-paced learning and knowledgeable professors. The online, metaverse-like experience is also highlighted as a positive feature.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
48%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
43%
0%
63%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Quality

I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations

Nothing to show

cyprus international university as a post-graduate

While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close