Kenyatta University vs St. Paul's University - SPU vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Bridge College vs Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC

Side-by-side comparison from 266 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Kenyatta University: wins 0/7 categories
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 5/7 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/7 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 1/7 categories
University of Nairobi: wins 1/7 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
227 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Software Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Economic and Social Sciences
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.41
4.63
Win
3.83
Not rated
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Location
4.55
4.60
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.25
Not rated
Professors
4.36
4.50
4.14
Not rated
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.22
4.27
Win
3.43
Not rated
4.00
4.25
Not rated
Student life
4.27
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Value
4.41
4.73
Win
3.86
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.95
4.58
Win
3.86
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +- Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
  • +- Well-structured and balanced curriculum
  • +- Opportunities for innovation and practical application
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Engaging, practical learning with supportive professors
  • +Positive study environment and networking opportunities
  • +Real-world exposure and career shaping

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and delays.
  • -Unfair and punitive grading systems compared to other institutions.
  • -Lack of specialization in some programs, leading to career uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong ratings across multiple facets, with Location being its standout strength at 4.55. Professors and Facilities also received high marks, scoring 4.36 and 4.41 respectively. Value and Student Life are similarly well-regarded. The area requiring the most improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest score at 3.95. Internationality also sits in the mid-range.

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

Across surveyed categories, this institution garners an exceptional 4.75 for its professors, its strongest attribute. The university also scores highly in location and internationality, both at 4.25, and boasts strong value at 4.5. Conversely, facilities at 3.25 and student life at 3.5 represent the weakest aspects of the student experience, while accommodation sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 228 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured courses, and supportive campus life. Minimal negative feedback noted issues with grading systems and project stage disorganization.

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students appreciate the learning environment, interactive and practical lessons, and supportive lecturer-student relationships. System delays are a minor, infrequently mentioned issue.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
54%
43%
0%
0%
25%
0%
4★
34%
46%
57%
0%
100%
75%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Life in KU

It was amazing, the professors were great. The school compound was extremely big and walking from one lecture hall to another was a big challenge. The long ques during meals at the mess was crazy. There is this thing called missing marks, you could visit exam office a million times without help.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close