Cebu Technological University - CTU vs Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD vs Box Hill Institute vs Cedarville University vs University of Iceland - HÍ
Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and teaching quality
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including libraries and gym
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Comprehensive education with hands-on professional practices
- +Essential knowledge and skills for successful careers
- +In-depth understanding and real-world experience
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and friendly professors and staff
- +Diverse student body and international interaction
- +High-quality academic training
- +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences.
- +High quality of higher education.
- +Practical, real-world application and specialization
- +Vibrant campus life and social events
- +Welcoming and inclusive community atmosphere
- +Strong sense of belonging and connection
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear communication and disorganization, are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant and sometimes unsafe learning environment.
- -A lack of course relevance and outdated curriculum leaves students feeling unprepared for their future careers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as poor or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in need of repair.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently criticized as outdated or ineffective.
This institution receives strong marks across most surveyed areas. Professors and value are standout categories, both scoring above 4.5. Student life, accommodation, and internationality also exhibit impressive ratings around 4.3-4.5. The weakest area identified is facilities, with a rating of 3.87. Overall, the university presents a positive picture with specific strengths in academic quality and overall value.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its prime location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. However, internationality stands out as a weaker area, scoring lower than other assessed aspects.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution achieved perfect scores across every evaluated metric. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received top marks. This indicates a consistently excellent experience for students in all aspects of their university journey, with no particular area standing out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others.
This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are areas with the lowest scores, both at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these domains.
Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores. The sole area of concern is the location, which was rated at zero, indicating it is a significant drawback compared to its otherwise excellent offerings.
Exceptional performance is evident across all surveyed aspects of the university. All categories, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received a perfect score of 5. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weaknesses to report. The institution appears to excel uniformly in all evaluated areas, offering a highly positive environment for its student body.
With a 4.65/5 average from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise newly built and well-equipped facilities, including libraries and gyms, along with excellent and friendly professors. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~50% positive). Students praise comprehensive education, essential skills, and valuable real-world experience through hands-on practices.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for friendly, supportive professors and staff. Diversity through international students is also highlighted as a positive aspect.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight practical work and the university's quality. A minor concern involves mandatory Icelandic subjects in some specializations.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university program is highly praised. Students highlight its strong focus on efficient water use, sustainability, and practical fieldwork, preparing them for real-world challenges.
The sole review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise diversity, social opportunities, and campus events for fostering a welcoming community.
The University is a state university and cant accommodate everyone, it means the students have to gain the slot. Students are selected by their grades from Senior High School and their scores from the entrance exam. It didn't end there, once they admit the students, they are required to retain a specific grade, failure to do so, is subjected to look for a private University. I highly recommend this University.
Dr. José Matías Delgado University proved to be an exceptional choice for my professional studies. The comprehensive education I received equipped me with the essential knowledge and skills required for a successful career. The curriculum was enhanced by hands-on professional practices, which provided me with valuable real-world experience across various fields. This practical approach facilitated the development of a significant and in-depth understanding of the subjects, thoroughly preparing me for the professional world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
