Nuertingen-Geislingen University - HfWU vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs University of Kiel vs University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 163 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Forward College (4.90)
Nuertingen-Geislingen University - HfWU: wins 1/5 categories
IU International University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/5 categories
University of Kiel: wins 0/5 categories
University of Applied Sciences Kiel - FH KIEL: wins 0/5 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/5 categories
Aalen University: wins 0/5 categories
Forward College: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: M.A. in Architecture
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Biochemistry
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Aalen, Germany
4.60
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Paris, France
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Politics and International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
3.69
3.50
Not rated
3.92
4.57
4.47
Location
3.00
3.87
2.50
Not rated
4.92
3.78
5.00
Win
Professors
5.00
4.43
2.50
Not rated
4.62
4.75
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.44
3.00
Not rated
4.92
Win
4.13
4.75
Student life
4.00
3.62
2.50
Not rated
4.15
4.25
4.73
Win
Value
4.00
4.32
4.00
Not rated
4.23
4.63
4.63
Accommodation
3.00
3.11
2.00
Not rated
3.62
4.29
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and applied learning approach
  • +Friendly and supportive university environment
  • +Focus on sustainability and interdisciplinary skills
  • +Flexible online study for work-life balance
  • +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
  • +Relevant, high-quality educational content
  • +Rigorous chemistry foundation prepares for advanced studies.
  • +Practical and theoretical learning through well-designed curricula.
  • +Strong emphasis on job-relevant skills and future career prospects.
  • +Opportunities for international and multicultural exposure.
  • +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Emphasis on practical, hands-on learning
  • +Vibrant international community and activities
  • +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Unique multi-city European study experience
Cons
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing them for the future.
  • -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
  • -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
  • -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
  • -Lack of support for international students and a significant language barrier.
  • -Social science programs are underdeveloped.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
  • -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder academic progress.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in academics and infrastructure, boasting perfect scores for facilities and professors. Areas needing improvement include location and accommodation, both receiving a moderate rating. Student life and internationality are well-regarded, contributing to a solid overall value.

This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a respectable 3.5 out of 5. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2, and professors, location, and student life, all scoring 2.5. While internationality is rated moderately at 3, the university's value for money stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a high 4.

Considering the provided ratings, the university presents a uniformly neutral profile, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every surveyed aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, performance across all evaluated facets of the university experience.

With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.

Across various aspects, this university demonstrates a strong academic and campus environment. Professors and value for money stand out as the highest-rated areas. Facilities and accommodation also receive very positive scores. Student life and internationality are well-regarded, indicating a good overall experience. The lowest-scoring category, location, suggests room for improvement in this particular aspect.

This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%), highlighting a friendly university environment and strong practical focus. There are no negative reviews.

~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.

With a 2.5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is split evenly. One reviewer highlights challenging but rewarding chemistry studies, while the other notes shortcomings in social sciences and minimal support for international students.

Students highlight excellent laboratory facilities, a well-designed curriculum for practical and job-related knowledge, and good international exposure. The average rating is 4/5, with positive feedback representing 100% of reviews.

With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.63/5, students highlight supportive professors and practical learning through projects. This hands-on approach greatly enhances understanding and employability.

Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
63%
0%
0%
69%
63%
94%
4★
50%
27%
50%
100%
23%
38%
6%
3★
50%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The best university in the world

My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close