Universidad Europea - UE vs Instituto Superior Técnico vs Nova School of Business and Economics vs Lisbon Accounting and Business School - ISCAL vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 350 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Exceptional teaching and expert faculty
- +Rigorous curriculum and strong academic preparation
- +Valuable extracurriculars and international opportunities
- +Great campus, facilities, and community
- +High-quality professors and practical teaching methods
- +Strong student clubs and networking opportunities
- +Dedicated and expert faculty
- +Practical and engaging curriculum
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities
- +Challenging academics and high expectations.
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty.
- +Flexible programs and career-focused education.
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Positive campus atmosphere and facilities
- +International and diverse community
- +Interactive and engaging learning approach
- +Focus on personal growth and development
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring issue.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
- -Limited resources and support, particularly for learning and career development, are a major drawback.
- -Administrative and organizational issues are prevalent.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance significantly detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of student support and engagement opportunities are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and communication issues
- -Poor teaching quality and grading
- -Outdated facilities
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
This institution excels notably in its **Location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Value** and **Internationality** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for improvement, followed by **Facilities**. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the mid-to-high range, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university excels in several key areas, with **Facilities** receiving an outstanding rating of 4.65 and **Internationality** also scoring very highly at 4.58. **Value** and **Professors** are also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category presents the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect compared to other surveyed elements. Student life and location are rated moderately well.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, and value all received exceptionally high marks, suggesting excellent academic and practical offerings. Student life and internationality also scored well, indicating a vibrant and globally-minded campus. The weakest areas appear to be facilities and accommodation, which, while still positive, scored lower than other categories.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors**, earning a high rating, and also scores well in **Location** and **Internationality**. While **Student Life** and **Facilities** are generally positive, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university also offers good **Value**, reflecting a well-rounded profile with specific areas for potential enhancement.
Overall, the institution receives a mixed but generally positive rating. Location stands out as the strongest aspect, achieving a perfect score. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Internationality and value for money are areas where improvement could be beneficial, as they receive the same middling score.
Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
With a 4.09 average rating from 22 reviews, ~77% of feedback is positive. Students praise challenging yet rewarding academics and excellent teaching staff. Zero negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews are highly positive (~94%), praising the campus, community, and professors. A small percentage (~3%) cite organizational issues and theoretical course content impacting job readiness.
Nearly all reviews are positive, ~89%, highlighting exceptional and supportive professors and practical, engaging programs. Excellent facilities and industry opportunities are also recurring themes.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students highlight excellent academic rigor, outstanding teaching quality with knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a strong learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic campus atmosphere, engaging classes, and helpful teachers. A small portion of negative feedback mentions issues with international student support and outdated facilities.
With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Not as good as most students would tell you. The facilities are far from brilliant: Almost every bathroom is dirty and broken. Prepare for an adventure if you're trying to find a place to study; since most rooms are crowded and there are no available power outlets for everyone (keep in mind this is an engineering university), people simply give up or spend hours looking for a place to study. The teaching/learning component is average at best: Most teachers are incapable of actually teaching. The evaluation method prizes students who are able to solve exercises faster, which gives me mixed feelings. Probably more than 70% of engineering students cheat on their tests because that's arguably the fastest way to solve them (and they have far better grades). The social interactions are awkward, to say the least: Most students that still haven't become depressed are cocky, and since they spend hours trying to collect exam resolutions, there's also a great division between people. Groups which somehow managed to get solutions for exercises/test/exams, will often refuse to share them with other mates - unless the other part has value to give as well. Not trying to be sexist, but the male portion of the students suffers from a very important problem, which is a greater difficulty in making friends, in creating relationships and also in having access to solved exercises or projects. This may not seem such a big deal, but the number of men who have become depressed while studying in IST is insane. They must spend more time when trying to collect information, they spend less time with actual people and day by day, year after year, most men sleep less, become more obsessed with virtual networks (i.e. games, social networks, forums, videos) and lose their social skills, which is a terrible side effect that really decreases the chances of future career success. The university is probably one of the most famous universities in Portugal, if not the most. Once a student finishes his degree, he usually finds no problems when looking for a job. The location is pretty good, there are a lot of surrounding places to eat and public transportation covers most of one's needs. I work now and I don't think I've learned a lot while I was a full-time studying in IST. I feel like I wasted a lot of my life and potential inside an institution where examination criteria was mildly unfair and most people were socially awkward, obsessive or manipulative. Definitely not the "best years of my life".
I believe Nova SBE offers many unique extra-curricular opportunities. For example, through this university, I have already secured two internships that allowed me to explore my future career paths. I also joined a student-led no-proft organization, Noma Consulting, which allowed me to work on a real-life consulting case with a market-leader company in Portugal. All of this in my first year. For gaining experience it is absolutely great. However the course itself is not my favourite part. Having done an international programme during school a felt it was a bit boring and unrelated to my degree, at times. But for those coming from Portuguese system this might be different. The student life, location, and teachers are also amazing. I definetly would recommend for students looking for higher education in Portugal!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
We pay a lot and we don´t have the best conditions. We have good teachers but there are a lot of teachers that are not that good at teaching and don´t give the best grades. The computers are old and it´s difficult to work with them.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
