Universidad Central de Venezuela - UCV vs Adama Science and Technology University - ASTU vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs William Angliss Institute - WAI vs Universidad Católica de Cuenca

Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rio Grande University and Community College (5.00)
Universidad Central de Venezuela - UCV: wins 1/6 categories
Adama Science and Technology University - ASTU: wins 0/6 categories
École de technologie supérieure - ETS: wins 0/6 categories
William Angliss Institute - WAI: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/6 categories
Arsi University - Aru: wins 0/6 categories
Rio Grande University and Community College: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Investigation
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Travel and Tourism Services
Best programme: Anesthesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
3.38
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
1.00
Location
4.39
4.12
4.50
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.74
3.69
3.50
5.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Internationality
4.21
2.85
2.50
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.39
4.27
1.50
4.00
Not rated
2.50
5.00
Win
Value
4.63
Win
3.62
3.50
3.00
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Accommodation
3.12
3.04
3.00
4.00
Not rated
1.50
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and prestigious reputation
  • +Rich learning experiences and critical thinking development
  • +Diverse extracurricular activities and personal growth opportunities
  • +Strong academic guidance and supportive learning environment
  • +Valuable hands-on technical education and real-world skill development
  • +Positive community and campus atmosphere
  • +Lack of English support for international students
  • +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
  • +Difficulty finding part-time employment
  • +Hands-on learning & accommodating staff
  • +Large campus
  • +Limited post-graduation options

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered focus and responsiveness to needs
  • +Supportive and helpful staff/professors.
  • +Small and close-knit community environment.
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate administrative and management support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of basic amenities are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary hurdles.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods disappoint students.
Rating summary
What students say

With particularly strong scores, the university excels in the areas of Professors and Value, achieving ratings above 4.6. Student Life and Location also received high marks, both at 4.39. Conversely, the weakest areas are Facilities and Accomodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.12 respectively. Internationality stands out as a well-regarded aspect, scoring 4.21.

Campus assessments reveal a university excelling in student life, with a score of 4.27, and location also scoring highly at 4.12. Conversely, internationality presents the weakest area, rated at 2.85. While facilities and accommodation received moderate scores (3.38 and 3.04 respectively), professors and value for money were rated more favorably, at 3.69 and 3.62.

A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its professors, who received a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all scored a solid 4 out of 5, indicating a well-rounded university experience. The weakest area appears to be value, which scored a 3, suggesting a slight concern in this regard compared to other aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution shows considerable strengths in its **value** and **internationality**, both scoring a solid 3.5 and 3 respectively. **Professors** and **location** also receive favorable marks at 3. However, **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness with a rating of just 1.5. Areas needing improvement include **facilities** (2) and **student life** (2.5).

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores. The primary area for improvement lies in its facilities, which were rated significantly lower. The value proposition sits in the middle range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.6/5 average rating, ~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality, democratic values, and diverse extracurriculars. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned a need for curriculum updates and improved campus conditions.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive teachers, a comfortable learning environment, valuable technical education, and a positive community. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university is positively received. The single review highlighted enjoyable hands-on course content and a large campus with accommodating staff.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~50% of feedback is positive. One reviewer recommended focusing on student needs, while no negative feedback was recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The sole review highlighted great staff and helpful professors.

Rating distribution
5★
68%
11%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
26%
37%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
3★
4%
52%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Central University of Venezuela: The house that overcomes the shadows.

The Central University of Venezuela is an autonomous institution of higher education located in the capital city of Venezuela. It is characterized by its good quality in terms of teachers and good students, both parties being very committed and competent. The graduates of this "house of studies" are characterized by being bright and comprehensive, are professionals and excellently manage their area of study, having even greater knowledge compared to the standards of students of the same degrees graduated from other universities nationwide. In the UCV there are many student movements that promote politics throughout the university, being one of the most political universities in the country. The student of this university is very requested at work level. Finally, I consider it a very good university because of its quality of staff, students and teachers and can really be considered as "the house that overcomes the shadows".

fostering science and tech in Ethiopia

I study at Adama Science and Technology University. The university offers a wide range of academic programs that cater to various interests, and the faculty is dedicated to providing quality education and support to students. The campus is equipped with modern facilities, including libraries, laboratories, and sports facilities. Additionally, the university offers numerous extracurricular activities and clubs that allow students to explore their interests outside of the classroom. my time at Adama Science and Technology University has been fulfilling, as I have been able to acquire knowledge, develop essential skills, and build lifelong friendships. I am confident that the education and experiences I have gained here will prepare me for a successful future in my chosen field.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close