University of Ghana - UG vs Central University vs Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration - GIMPA vs Islamic University of Ghana - IUG vs Accra Technical University
Side-by-side comparison from 296 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Practical, relevant programmes with industry insights
- +Approachable, friendly, and dedicated lecturers
- +Supportive, quiet, and enabling learning environment
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Practical, career-focused education
- +Positive and conducive learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Strong focus on practical learning and job market preparation
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +Encourages leadership and professional growth
- +Practical, field-based learning in communities
- +Modern facilities and knowledgeable professors
- +Moderate fees
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content lacks relevance and practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring issue.
- -The curriculum is often inflexible and irrelevant to current needs.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Overall, this university presents a strong profile. Its highest-rated area is **Internationality** at 4.375, demonstrating a significant global presence. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** emerge as the weakest points, both scoring 3.375. **Location** and **Student Life** are well-regarded, tied at 3.875, while **Value** sits at a solid 3.75.
This institution garners strong marks across several key areas. Location stands out as its strongest attribute, alongside high ratings for professors and value. Student life and internationality also receive positive evaluations. However, the weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a comparatively lower score, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing.
Nothing to show
A review of university ratings reveals a strong performance in value and professor quality, with scores of 4.41 and 4.36 respectively. Student life and internationality also received high marks, both at 3.95. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.24, followed by facilities at 3.67. The location received a respectable 3.82 rating.
Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance with notable strengths in Value, Professors, and Accomodation, all scoring an average of 4 or higher. Student Life, Location, and Internationality also received solid ratings, hovering around 3.7. The facilities, while adequate, represent the lowest-scoring area at 3.57, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~70% of feedback is positive. Students praise a blend of theory and practice in programs, approachable lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~90%), with students praising academic quality and preparedness for careers. A small amount of feedback (~0%) noted outdated teaching materials and facilities.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% highlight hands-on learning and supportive lecturers. A few mention limited practical facilities or a desire for more programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight impactful community engagement and practical field-based learning experiences. Modern facilities, knowledgeable professors, and moderate fees are also mentioned.
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
My honest opinion about central university I will say conducive atmosphere for studying. What I didn’t like I will say is lecturers do not pay much attention to students' reports (exams papers and end of semester results ), you will have to go to hell and back before you will finally get what has to be worked on done. I will suggest they pay more attention to students' needs. In all my stay at Central University was a good one.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
