Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs GoIT Neoversity

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International University of Finance - IUF (5.00)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/4 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/4 categories
National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI: wins 0/4 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 0/4 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/4 categories
Kyiv Medical University - KMU: wins 0/4 categories
International University of Finance - IUF: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: MBA
Kiev, Ukraine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Location
4.11
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.89
Not rated
2.00
4.33
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Value
4.33
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs

Nothing to show

  • +Strong technical foundation and useful experience
  • +Cool community and interesting social life
  • +Intense but manageable workload
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable quality education
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical, well-structured curriculum
  • +Strong campus atmosphere and good friendships
  • +Nice and approachable teachers
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management indifference to student well-being.
  • -Outdated facilities and ongoing maintenance problems.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support creates frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and opportunities is common.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

Nothing to show

Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional ratings across most categories, with perfect scores awarded for both **Location** and **Accomodation**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received outstanding marks. The **Professors** area, while still strong, is the relatively weakest point at a solid 4 out of 5.

Consistently scoring a perfect 5 across all metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated outstandingly. There are no discernible weak areas, as the university achieves top marks uniformly. This indicates a uniformly excellent and well-rounded educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight affordable education and a solid curriculum with a good balance of theory and practical experience. Faculty are described as knowledgeable and supportive.

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. The student enjoyed the atmosphere and appreciated the nice teachers, strongly recommending it.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
33%
67%
0%
50%
100%
4★
31%
0%
33%
33%
0%
50%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Strong Foundation for Future Healthcare Careers

Kyiv Medical University offers a solid educational foundation for aspiring healthcare professionals. The faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing valuable insights and guidance throughout the program. The curriculum is well-structured, combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, which is essential for our future careers. Opinion: Overall, my experience at Kyiv Medical University has been positive. I appreciate the emphasis on hands-on training and the opportunities to interact with patients early in our studies. The campus environment is vibrant and fosters a sense of community among students. However, I feel that there could be improvements in certain administrative processes, which can sometimes be slow and cumbersome. Recommendation: I would recommend Kyiv Medical University to those looking to pursue a medical career, as it equips students with the necessary skills and knowledge. The supportive atmosphere and strong academic foundation make it a worthwhile choice for anyone passionate about healthcare.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close