Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 0/7 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/7 categories
Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 7/7 categories
Ulyanovsk State University - UlSU: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.95
4.64
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.18
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
4.39
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.75
4.85
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.20
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.93
3.66
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support and career assistance
  • +Active campus life and creative opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.
  • +Diverse academic programs and faculties
  • +Extensive facilities and resources
  • +Strong international connections and collaborations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & equipment
  • -Inconsistent and uninspiring teaching quality
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Inconsistent or poor quality teaching across departments frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause unnecessary stress and inefficiency.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

A consistent rating of zero across all surveyed categories presents a peculiar academic profile. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or identifiable weaknesses to highlight. The university performs uniformly poorly in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, according to the provided metrics.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Presenting a concerning picture, this university received zero ratings in all surveyed categories: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no apparent strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the institution scored identically across every aspect of its operation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

All four reviews are positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the quality of education and professors, while also mentioning good employment support and developed public activities.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The feedback highlights strong academic programs across many faculties and extensive facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
38%
44%
50%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
44%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close