Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs Audencia Business School vs EM Strasbourg Business School vs Digital College vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SHG Universities (5.00)
Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA: wins 2/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EM Strasbourg Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Digital College: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
SHG Universities: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: MSc in International Management & Business
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.95
Win
3.92
3.93
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.46
4.06
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.10
4.09
4.19
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.27
4.34
4.32
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.46
Win
3.99
4.03
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.17
4.21
4.19
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.73
3.56
3.93
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International environment and diverse student life
  • +High-quality academics and supportive professors
  • +Engaging courses with practical applications
  • +Excellent professors and well-structured programs
  • +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
  • +Great campus facilities and convenient city location
  • +Strong personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Supportive, engaging faculty and dynamic student life
  • +International environment and career-focused programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
  • -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
  • -Lack of practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and issues with constructive criticism.
  • -Disappointing facilities and a lack of dynamism.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** (4.34) and **Value** (4.21). **Professors** (4.09) and **Location** (4.06) also received favorable scores. **Accommodations** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect at 3.56, while **Facilities** (3.92) and **Student Life** (3.99) fall within the mid-range of assessments.

This institution is particularly well-regarded for its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life also garners positive feedback. Areas for potential improvement lie in the facilities and accommodation, which received the lowest ratings. Professors and the overall value proposition of the university are also rated favorably, indicating a solid overall performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~94% of reviews being highly satisfied. Students praise the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) mentions disappointment with specific program content and professor engagement.

With an average rating of 4.26/5 from 31 reviews, ~74% highlight strong personal/professional development, supportive professors, and a dynamic international environment. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
35%
42%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
60%
59%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
High-quality teaching

The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close