Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs EM Strasbourg Business School vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs Digital College vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SHG Universities (5.00)
Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA: wins 1/7 categories
EM Strasbourg Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Digital College: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
SHG Universities: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.95
3.94
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.46
4.36
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.10
4.14
4.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.27
4.23
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.46
Win
4.03
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.17
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.73
3.91
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International environment and diverse student life
  • +High-quality academics and supportive professors
  • +Engaging courses with practical applications
  • +Supportive professors and engaging courses
  • +Strong international environment and opportunities
  • +Excellent personal and professional development
  • +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
  • -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are problematic.
  • -The program lacks practical usefulness and career support.
  • -Outdated facilities and an unfriendly atmosphere are noted.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.

This university demonstrates a strong standing in several key areas. Its location is particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest rating among all categories. Professors and internationality also score highly, indicating positive attributes in teaching quality and global engagement. While student life and value are also favorable, accommodation and facilities represent the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.

This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.

Most university student reviews are positive (around 97%), highlighting supportive professors, interesting courses, and an international environment. A small amount of negative feedback (around 3%) mentions program helpfulness and student atmosphere.

With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
46%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
60%
37%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
High-quality teaching

The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close