London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs College of Estate Management vs Henley Business School vs University of West London

Side-by-side comparison from 466 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bath Business School (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
College of Estate Management: wins 0/7 categories
Henley Business School: wins 1/7 categories
University of West London: wins 2/7 categories
Bath Business School: wins 2/7 categories
University of Reading: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Reading, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Reading, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
Bath, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Reading, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
77 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.47
Win
4.33
4.30
Location
4.78
Win
3.57
Not rated
4.20
4.48
3.67
4.49
Professors
4.26
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.48
4.67
Win
4.19
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.14
Not rated
4.40
4.49
4.00
4.38
Student life
3.63
3.71
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.25
3.67
4.23
Value
4.04
4.00
Not rated
3.80
4.35
Win
4.00
4.21
Accommodation
3.79
3.50
Not rated
4.20
3.93
5.00
Win
4.03
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
  • +Diverse assessment methods and flexible study options
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical application of theory
  • +Strong academic programmes and career support
  • +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
  • +Industry connections and career opportunities
  • +Engaging and relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive staff and positive campus environment
  • +Caring and supportive faculty
  • +Professional growth opportunities and career flexibility
  • +Vibrant campus community and social events
  • +Supportive community and engaging teaching
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in courses are recurring issues.
  • -Insufficient social life and a judgmental environment are frequently mentioned complaints.
  • -Inconsistent grading, administrative inefficiencies, and inadequate student support services are significant concerns.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or outdated.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Inflexible academic policies hinder student progress.
  • -Unapproachable and unhelpful staff create a poor learning environment.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities hinder student experience.
  • -Lack of university support and student motivation is disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives its highest marks for **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), indicating a significant global presence and desirable setting. **Professors** are also highly rated (4.26). Areas with the lowest scores are **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accomodation** (3.79), suggesting potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience, while **Facilities** (4.04) and **Value** (4.04) fall into a mid-range performance.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in student life and internationality, both receiving high marks. Location and accommodation also score well. However, the university's weakest area is its value for money, which is rated lower than other aspects. Facilities and professors receive solid, above-average scores, indicating general satisfaction across these key areas.

This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with exceptionally high marks for Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48). Facilities and Location also received very favorable scores. Student Life and Value are well-regarded, though Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.93.

This institution achieves excellent marks in accommodation, with a perfect score, and strong ratings for professors and facilities. Conversely, location and student life represent the weakest aspects. Internationality and value are rated moderately well, indicating a generally positive but uneven profile.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.49. **Internationality** also received a high rating at 4.38. The lowest-rated area is **Accomodation**, scoring 4.03, though it still remains a positive score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value all fall within a close and favorable range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting expert faculty, academic reputation, and community. A small ~3.4% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about teaching quality and careers services.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight hands-on learning, strong career preparation, and supportive campus environments. No negative feedback was received.

With a 4.45/5 average rating from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the great experiences, strong industry connections leading to job placements, relevant curriculum, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Recurring themes include supportive faculty, numerous professional development opportunities, and a vibrant campus community with social events.

With ~96% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.27/5, students praise supportive communities, knowledgeable lecturers, and engaging courses. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with lecturer approachability and teaching styles.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
43%
0%
40%
57%
100%
44%
4★
44%
29%
0%
40%
31%
0%
44%
3★
19%
14%
0%
20%
12%
0%
8%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
1★
1%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close