London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Cranfield University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Cranfield University School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 487 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Central location and accessibility
- +Knowledgeable and supportive staff/tutors
- +High-quality, engaging education and opportunities
- +Strong postgraduate focus and specialized programs
- +World-class research facilities and industry partnerships
- +Excellent career services and networking opportunities
- +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
- +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
- +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
- +High-quality, practical programmes with strong career focus
- +Excellent tutors and world-class resources
- +Prestigious reputation and high rankings
- +Engaging teaching and relevant curriculum.
- +Strong career support and real-world opportunities.
- +Vibrant student life and city location.
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Poor teaching quality and ineffective lectures.
- -Lack of academic rigor and research standards.
- -Financial focus over student learning and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders academic progress.
- -Poor quality education and value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Unfulfilled promises and course changes without notice.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving ratings above 4.3. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score highly, indicating positive academic and social environments. The **Value** proposition is solid at over 4.1. However, **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score, falling below 4.0, suggesting it could benefit from improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and resources. Professors receive an excellent rating of 4.5, and facilities are also highly regarded at 4. A respectable score of 4 for value suggests a worthwhile investment for students. Areas requiring improvement include location, which received a lower score of 2.5. Student life and internationality are rated moderately at 3.5, while accommodation stands at 3.75.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.
A comprehensive assessment reveals considerable strengths and areas for development. Professors receive the highest marks at 4.57, with Facilities and Student Life also scoring well at 4.14. Value is rated a solid 4. Conversely, Location is the weakest area, rated at 3.14, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower at 3.43. Accommodations are rated favorably at 3.86.
Considering the provided feedback, the university excels in its **location**, boasting the highest score. **Student life** and **professors** also receive strong commendations. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating. The university presents a generally positive overview, with a notable need for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With a 4.32 average rating from 101 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, praising the university's excellent location, helpful staff, and engaging course content. A small 2% of feedback offered criticism.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~74% praise Cranfield University's postgraduate focus, industry links, research facilities, and career services. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a ~93% positive rating (4.29/5), students highlight prestigious programs, practical learning, and career support. Minimal negative feedback exists, not currently representing a recurring theme.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~97% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students praise engaging courses, professional development opportunities, and supportive faculty. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentions unmet expectations regarding course content and communication.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
Cranfield University, established in 1946 as the UK's only exclusively postgraduate university, is producing global leaders in technology and management through its world-class expertise, large-scale facilities, and unrivalled industry partnerships. Likes: * Located in the heart of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc in the United Kingdom. * Research facilities and industry collaborations. * Excellent career services. * World-Class Library. * Good student-to-faculty ratio. Dislikes: * Because the campus is located in a village, you will miss some of the entertainment and conveniences of a city, but you will make wonderful friends on campus. * It is not a Russell Group university, despite being a high-caliber institution.
Nothing to show
Having worked in the finance sector for over half a decade, my programme (MSc Finance and Management) repositioned my existing knowledge of the sector practically and theoretically through a predominantly quantitative approach to financial management studies. The Cranfield School of management has incredibly educated, experienced, and professional tutors to fit each and every module offered. The finance Information Technology (IT) resources in the faculty's possession are world-class and up-to-date, providing real-time data analysis and research solutions. I also had the opportunity to meet intelligently amazing people (co-students) from all works of life. The university environment is serene, comfortable, and accommodating. The alumni network is far-reaching and supportive. In summary, I had an extraordinarily memorable experience studying for my MSc in Finance and Management at Cranfield University. I highly recommend the University to prospective students
My experience at LJMU has been parred none and has exceeded my expectations. The facilities are superb and staff members are accommodating, approachable and welcoming. Honestly speaking, attending LJMU feels like a home away from home. Socially the university has a very inclusive culture. I cannot speak for all programs, but the MA in Education has been life and career-transforming for me. I am very happy I chose LJMU.
Nothing to show
