London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Cranfield University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Cranfield University School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 511 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Strong postgraduate focus and mature atmosphere
- +World-class facilities and industry partnerships
- +Excellent career services and renowned faculty
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +High-quality, practical programmes with strong career focus
- +Excellent tutors and world-class resources
- +Prestigious reputation and high rankings
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
- +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
- +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
- -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution excels in its Facilities and Professors, both scoring a strong 4.33. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are also well-regarded, each receiving a 3.83. Accommodation is rated a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, is Location, with a score of 2.67.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
A comprehensive assessment reveals considerable strengths and areas for development. Professors receive the highest marks at 4.57, with Facilities and Student Life also scoring well at 4.14. Value is rated a solid 4. Conversely, Location is the weakest area, rated at 3.14, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower at 3.43. Accommodations are rated favorably at 3.86.
Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise world-class research facilities, industry partnerships, and excellent career services. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a ~93% positive rating (4.29/5), students highlight prestigious programs, practical learning, and career support. Minimal negative feedback exists, not currently representing a recurring theme.
With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
For the campus is going 10/10, a lovely place, comfortable ambience and cozy life you can have. Especially people who want switch from capital city to tranquil area. The natural campus provides soothe accommodations, facilities and communities. For the course is going to 7/10, sufficient practical and hands-on programme while your main modules. However, some styles of professor you might take more time to familiar with it. Most of modules blend academic logical and company's project. Moreover, the UK's MSc has just one year, so it makes you feel intensive and stressful. Especially some assignments are not easy to accomplishment in a limited time. For the communities, includes club, social life and corporate competition, could be 8/10. In Cranfield, as an unique campus which only provides MSc
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Having worked in the finance sector for over half a decade, my programme (MSc Finance and Management) repositioned my existing knowledge of the sector practically and theoretically through a predominantly quantitative approach to financial management studies. The Cranfield School of management has incredibly educated, experienced, and professional tutors to fit each and every module offered. The finance Information Technology (IT) resources in the faculty's possession are world-class and up-to-date, providing real-time data analysis and research solutions. I also had the opportunity to meet intelligently amazing people (co-students) from all works of life. The university environment is serene, comfortable, and accommodating. The alumni network is far-reaching and supportive. In summary, I had an extraordinarily memorable experience studying for my MSc in Finance and Management at Cranfield University. I highly recommend the University to prospective students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
