University of the People - UoPeople vs California Institute of Technology - Caltech vs ArtCenter College of Design vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 3,347 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of the People - UoPeople (4.90)
University of the People - UoPeople: wins 5/7 categories
California Institute of Technology - Caltech: wins 0/7 categories
ArtCenter College of Design: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Pasadena, California, United States
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
3296 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Pasadena, California, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Pasadena, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.56
Win
4.37
Not rated
3.93
Location
4.54
4.19
Not rated
4.87
Win
Professors
4.74
Win
4.42
Not rated
4.53
Internationality
4.83
3.81
Not rated
4.87
Win
Student life
4.57
Win
4.26
Not rated
4.14
Value
4.79
Win
4.22
Not rated
4.13
Accommodation
4.26
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Tuition-free and accredited education
  • +Flexible online learning and accessible resources
  • +Diverse international student interaction and personal empowerment
  • +Practical, experiential learning for career readiness.
  • +Strong academic support and extensive opportunities.
  • +Close-knit, supportive community and innovation focus.

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
Cons
  • -Data security breaches and privacy concerns are a major issue.
  • -Hidden costs like mandatory exam fees make the "tuition-free" claim misleading.
  • -Navigating online learning platforms and a lack of community support are frustrating.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unengaging or poorly structured curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
  • -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its Internationality (4.83) and Professors (4.74) ratings. Value for money (4.79) also scores very highly. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation at 4.26. Overall, the university receives very positive feedback across all measured aspects, with particularly impressive scores in its teaching quality and global outlook.

With a generally positive performance, the university excels in its **Facilities** (4.37) and **Professors** (4.42), indicating a strong academic and physical environment. **Value** (4.22) also receives a commendable rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.89) and **Internationality** (3.81) represent areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~99.7% of reviews are positive, praising tuition-free, accredited, and flexible online learning. A very small fraction of negative feedback mentioned navigation challenges and a data breach.

Most students report highly positive experiences, citing practical and innovative learning, strong academic support, and a supportive community. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.

Nothing to show

The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.

Rating distribution
5★
89%
44%
0%
67%
4★
9%
47%
0%
20%
3★
1%
8%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
13%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Flexible and Affordable Path to Higher Education

My experience at the University of the People was positive and rewarding. The online learning format allowed me to pursue my BSc in Health Science while managing other responsibilities. I gained valuable knowledge in public health, epidemiology, human biology, and health services. The coursework helped me strengthen my research, critical thinking, and academic writing skills. I also appreciated the opportunity to study with students from different backgrounds. The programme required discipline, time management, and independent learning, especially when meeting weekly deadlines. Although online study requires personal commitment, the flexible structure and affordable education made the journey worthwhile. I graduated Cum Laude, and I am grateful for the knowledge and foundation I gained. I recommend UoPeople to students seeking flexible, accessible higher education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close