Girne American University - GAU vs Eastern Mediterranean University - DAU vs Cyprus International Institute of Management vs The American College of Cyprus vs Cyprus International University

Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Cyprus International University (4.30)
Girne American University - GAU: wins 0/7 categories
Eastern Mediterranean University - DAU: wins 2/7 categories
Cyprus International Institute of Management: wins 0/7 categories
The American College of Cyprus: wins 3/7 categories
Cyprus International University: wins 2/7 categories
European University Cyprus: wins 0/7 categories
Cyprus West University - CWU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.13
4.24
Not rated
4.00
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.50
4.03
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.11
4.23
Not rated
4.00
4.30
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.89
4.48
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.11
4.25
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.03
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.56
4.26
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.67
4.27
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and guiding teachers
  • +Encouraging and inspiring environment
  • +Excellent resources and student life support
  • +Diverse international community and peer learning
  • +Well-structured, comprehensive academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Strong career preparation and internship opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Vibrant community and engaging living environment
  • +Frequent and enjoyable campus events and activities
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Study-friendly environment and resources
  • +Comprehensive program offerings

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as uninspired and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative & management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of practical application in curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives its highest marks for the quality of its professors, followed closely by its internationality and location. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and student life also received middling scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

This institution achieves excellent ratings in several key areas, particularly in **Internationality** which stands out at 4.48. **Accomodation** and **Value** also score highly, both above 4.25. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are similarly well-regarded. The **Location** emerges as the weakest area, though still rated positively at 4.03, indicating a generally strong overall perception.

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with particular excellence in Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and Professors are also well-regarded at 4. Value for money is rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.5, though still meeting a reasonable standard.

Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 70% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff and a good learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%) with an average rating of 4.07/5. Students praise the diverse community, academic programs, and experienced faculty, noting strong career preparation and extensive resources. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a vibrant community with frequent events and seasonal celebrations, making it an engaging and recommendable living environment.

Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
15%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
50%
78%
0%
100%
63%
0%
0%
3★
30%
7%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Excellent

A renounced and progressive university that offers student with the best education and goes beyond and over to help students achieve excellence in their respective departments. An environment that supports and encourages student to strive .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

cyprus international university as a post-graduate

While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close