London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Aberdeen vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Bangor University vs University of Central Lancashire - UCLAN
Side-by-side comparison from 722 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive community & accessible academic help
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs
- +Vibrant campus life & diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Exceptional, passionate, and approachable lecturers/professors
- +Welcoming, supportive community and helpful staff
- +Beautiful location with abundant activities and resources
- +Practical skills and hands-on experience
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Enhanced confidence and independence
- +Strong staff support and approachability
- +Comprehensive student welfare and financial aid
- +Development of professional confidence and skills
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of accessible resources and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Discrimination and mishandling of complaints.
- -Poor support and understanding for disabled students.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear explanations from lecturers.
- -Disorganized administration and mismanaged funding.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices are a major concern.
- -The facility is old and in dire need of an upgrade.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Performance metrics indicate a consistently strong showing for the institution. Outstanding marks were achieved in Internationality (4.7) and Professors (4.59), reflecting excellent global engagement and faculty quality. Location also received a high rating. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, scoring 4.19, though still generally positive. Overall, the university demonstrates a high level of satisfaction across various aspects.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
This institution garners commendable reviews, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** also received very positive scores. The **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, though it remains a solid score, indicating room for improvement in this specific area while other facets of the university experience are well-regarded.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its Facilities, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Internationality also received favorable scores, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, Accommodations were rated the lowest, suggesting room for improvement. Professors and Value also scored well, while Location received a strong, though not top-tier, evaluation.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback. Student life stands out as the strongest area, followed closely by facilities and value. Location also received favorable reviews. Conversely, accommodation scored the lowest among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement. Professor quality and internationality were rated moderately well.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.64 average rating from 44 reviews, ~95% of feedback is positive. Students praise the supportive environment, engaging courses, and helpful faculty. Some noted limited campus facilities during peak times.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.51/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising excellent lecturers, beautiful location, and supportive staff. One review mentioned negative experiences regarding discrimination.
Over 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs and helpful lecturers. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with accessibility and organizational concerns.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent staff support, student welfare services, and career guidance. One negative review mentioned inconsistent grading.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The University of Aberdeen is a unique learning environment for students interested in want to deepen their knowledge. The lecturers in Aberdeen a really business-like. As a student who has been in the University since 2020, I can confirm that students get value for their tuition through the sacrifices of the lecturers and the academic environment.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
What I liked was the building itself, it is rather stunning, however... Whilst attending an annual PhD review, derogatory remarks were made against my speech, which is often slurred and incoherent when stressed due to being autistic. Bangor University not only ignored and undermined my complaint, but went further to add additional abuse. Discrimination policies and the Equality Act 2010 mean nothing to Bangor University. I would advise avoiding.
The school is competitive and you have to be pretty well up on the basics of the subject as the course is fast-paced and has no time for slow coaches. Good layout for both disability and wheelchair users, clean and up to date technology, providing lots of pastoral activities, student union and support excellent.
Amazing university and a great experience for me. I really think it's the best option to live a full college experience. The level of studies and teachers is good, besides being a campus a long time ago. Then you have the option of the village that also has a lot of life.
Nothing to show
