University of Sarajevo - UNSA vs Edge Hill University - EHU vs Sarajevo School of Science and Technology - SSST vs International Burch University - BURCH vs International University Of Sarajevo - IUS
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and inspiring professors
- +Diverse program options and growth opportunities
- +Strong student life and networking
- +Student-centered support and opportunities
- +Beautiful campus and resources
- +Relevant and industry-experienced lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Supportive, dedicated, and professional professors
- +Strong practical skill development for future careers
- +Engaging and enriching learning experiences
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High didactic standards and educational quality
- +Blend of traditional and problem-based learning
- +Sufficient anatomy lab resources
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair policies and poor staff conduct.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern technology.
- -Unfair treatment of students and disregard for their needs by those in charge.
- -Inadequate support systems for students' needs.
- -Poor administrative responsiveness and management.
- -Lack of comprehensive career guidance beyond specific paths.
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and support from staff.
- -Inconvenient and outdated facilities.
- -Overpriced tuition for the quality of education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -A perceived lack of value or outdated curriculum is a recurring concern.
Overall, the university garners mixed reviews. Its strongest areas are location and professors, both receiving high marks. Student life also scores well. However, facilities and accommodation present areas for improvement, with the lowest ratings. Internationality also ranks low, while value sits in the mid-range.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, which received a high rating of 4.38. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also scored well, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the lowest-rated area at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. **Student Life** and **Value** also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience, evidenced by perfect scores for Professors and Student Life. Accommodations also receive top marks. The university's facilities and overall value are rated well at a 4. However, the location and internationality of the university are areas with lower scores, both receiving a 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightly in several key areas. Professors are rated a perfect 5, alongside its location and overall value for money, indicating exceptional quality and appeal. Student life also garners a strong score of 4. However, the university's accommodation is a significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 1. Facilities and internationality are moderately rated at 3.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, growth opportunities, and good student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions disorganization and outdated resources.
~95% of 40 university reviews are positive, praising student support, campus, and opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with lecturing and academic support.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight highly skilled, approachable, and dedicated professors who build strong student relationships and offer ample support. Programs are praised for practical skill development and preparing students for future careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university is well regarded with ~100% positive feedback, praised for its didactic standards, educational quality, and sufficient anatomy labs. However, ~26% of feedback notes deficient classroom infrastructure and outdated furniture.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show