Embassy English vs Kingston University - KU vs University of Sarajevo - UNSA vs Sarajevo School of Science and Technology - SSST vs International Burch University - BURCH
Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Patient, understandable teaching and pleasant classroom atmosphere
- +Opportunities for international peer interaction
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
- +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
- +Supportive and inspiring professors
- +Diverse program options and growth opportunities
- +Strong student life and networking
Nothing to show
- +Supportive, dedicated, and professional professors
- +Strong practical skill development for future careers
- +Engaging and enriching learning experiences
Nothing to show
- +Empowering and supportive academic environment
- +Personalized attention and approachable lecturers
- +Strong focus on key disciplines for women
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and responsiveness from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
- -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair policies and poor staff conduct.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern technology.
- -Unfair treatment of students and disregard for their needs by those in charge.
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and support from staff.
- -Inconvenient and outdated facilities.
- -Overpriced tuition for the quality of education.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are major concerns.
Across all assessed categories, the university received uniform ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent zero score across the board suggests a complete lack of positive or negative feedback in any of these areas.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.
Overall, the university garners mixed reviews. Its strongest areas are location and professors, both receiving high marks. Student life also scores well. However, facilities and accommodation present areas for improvement, with the lowest ratings. Internationality also ranks low, while value sits in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience, evidenced by perfect scores for Professors and Student Life. Accommodations also receive top marks. The university's facilities and overall value are rated well at a 4. However, the location and internationality of the university are areas with lower scores, both receiving a 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving outstanding scores. Student life and accommodation are also rated positively. However, the university's location receives a moderate rating, and its internationality is a noted area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories.
With a high average rating of 4/5 from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review highlights an excellent learning environment, patient teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere.
Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, growth opportunities, and good student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions disorganization and outdated resources.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight highly skilled, approachable, and dedicated professors who build strong student relationships and offer ample support. Programs are praised for practical skill development and preparing students for future careers.
Nothing to show
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Kiriri Women's University for its supportive and empowering academic environment. Lecturers are described as approachable and knowledgeable, fostering personalized attention and growth.
Nothing to show
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
