Université Paris Diderot vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs GEM Alpine Business School vs ESCE Paris International Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 162 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université Paris Diderot: wins 5/7 categories
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
GEM Alpine Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESCE Paris International Business School: wins 1/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: International Marketing
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.10
4.22
4.10
4.75
Win
3.43
3.83
Location
5.00
Win
4.29
4.66
3.92
4.75
4.64
4.92
Professors
5.00
Win
4.28
4.12
4.19
4.75
3.86
4.58
Internationality
4.00
4.34
4.63
4.06
4.50
4.50
4.92
Win
Student life
5.00
Win
4.41
4.30
4.20
4.25
4.07
4.08
Value
5.00
Win
4.17
4.49
4.15
4.25
3.64
4.17
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.82
4.00
3.83
3.50
2.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and insightful courses
  • +Small class sizes for better connections
  • +Good campus facilities and location
  • +Excellent faculty and stimulating academic environment
  • +Strong international student community and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and practical focus
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse faculty and global insights
  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
  • +Strong networking and international opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs taught by industry professionals
  • +Supportive staff and personalized learning experiences
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues, especially for international students.
  • -Poor English communication and fluency from both administration and some professors.
  • -Lack of inclusivity and accessibility for non-French speakers.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
  • -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores, with near-perfect ratings for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. Its weakest areas, while still strong, are Facilities and Internationality, both receiving a respectable 4 out of 5.

An assessment of the university reveals strong student life and internationality, with ratings of 4.41 and 4.34 respectively. Professors and location also received favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scored 3.82. Overall, facilities and value were rated well, indicating a generally positive experience for students in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, and location, all scoring an impressive 4.75. Student life and value are also well-regarded at 4.25, with internationality close behind at 4.5. The weakest area of performance is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its core offerings and campus environment.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise excellent study levels, qualified professors, and a positive university experience.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~97% of feedback praising excellent faculty, practical learning, and a supportive international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights administrative and communication issues, particularly for international students.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent international environments and engaging programs, often taught by experienced professionals. Some note a preference for in-person learning over online options.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
45%
63%
44%
25%
21%
67%
4★
50%
55%
27%
46%
75%
50%
25%
3★
0%
0%
10%
10%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Positive feedback

Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business

An Impeccable Group of Staff

In an MSc fast track program, I had the privilege of spending time a large and intensive period with each educator, including supporting staff. From core marketing classes to general soft skill and one on one meetings, a large sum went above and beyond what was expected. From moral, educational, in some cases emotional support, the staff laid down a foundation for me to grow and reach my truest potential. In their own personal capacities, each staff took a unique approach to part with their knowledge, wisdom, support and experience. From an educational perspective, the educators sparked curiosity, critical and analytical thinking in me, allowing me to look at the world of business, advertising and marketing in a new light. While some information may have come across as “far fetched” or “hard to believe” it showcased that the program wasn’t merely looking to scratch the surface, but project the future, years in advance. With majority of the courses I take, I found my own passion for the content, mounding it in a way that I could use, apply and consider in my professional career. However, at the core of my memorable experience was the personal contact I had with a large majority ESCE professional staff. They made me feel welcome, accepted, and seen, allowing me to voice my thoughts, my own experience, and knowledge. I believe my masters success would not be possible without the influence of all members at ESCE.

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close