Riga Technical University - RTU vs RISEBA University vs Turiba University vs University of Latvia - LU vs EKA University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, modern, and applied engineering programmes
- +Well-organized university with excellent faculty and facilities
- +Clear teaching approach and up-to-date curricula
- +Flexible study schedules and international opportunities
- +Interactive learning with dedicated and supportive professors
- +Good facilities and English-taught programs
- +Quality of education and engaging courses
- +Convenient and pleasant campus environment
- +Well-organized educational process
- +Supportive lecturers and organized study process
- +Abundant extracurricular events and opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and convenient location
- +Affordable European study opportunities
- +Insight into European institutions
- +Impactful facilitator support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative inefficiency and unresponsiveness
- -Poor quality and unhelpful staff/faculty
- -Rising accommodation costs
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear academic expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Some professors are perceived as unhelpful or lacking engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives positive feedback across most aspects, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated area. **Professors** and **Value** also score well. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately well, indicating room for enhancement.
Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received a perfect score of five. The only area not reaching the highest mark was accommodation, rated at a still solid four. Overall, the university offers a highly positive experience with excellent value for its students.
Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students.
This university receives commendations in several key areas, with an outstanding 4.5 for Location. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.38. Facilities and Student Life are well-regarded with a 4.25 rating. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the weaker aspects, with scores of 3.91 and 3.85 respectively.
This institution garners strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Areas for improvement are evident in **Student Life**, which received a lower score of 2, and **Value**, rated at 2.5. The **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3.5, while **Accomodation** also scores a respectable 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most reviews (around 74%) highlight practical learning, modern facilities, and clear teaching, with some mentioning specialized engineering programs. A small percentage (about 4.2%) notes administrative delays and less helpful staff.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the good teaching level, professor support, and international opportunities. Programs taught in English and interactive learning environments are also highlighted.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This feedback highlights a pleasant campus, organized education, and satisfying quality of knowledge.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, an organized academic environment, and convenient location. A single negative review found standards low compared to others.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights affordability and learning about European institutions. Negative feedback is minimal, representing ~0% of reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm just started studying Mathematics. The matherial, which lectors are giving to us, and the way of the studying is simple. Also there is options to study by ourselves in rooms with noise isolation. And also I can see, that the university collect a advises from students to develop.
The easiest way to begin with Europe Pretty cheap to study and possible to know more about the European institutions I d strictly recomend it to all the EU newcomers Facilitators are really about to give some Impact to students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
