emlyon business school vs Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1 vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESDES School of Management vs Lyon Catholic University (UCLY)
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Strong science and technology programs
- +Supportive professors and academic environment
- +Diverse student body
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Practical experience through internships and work-study
- +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
- +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
- +Opportunities for networking and future connections
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Communication from staff is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.
Nothing to show
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also garnered strong scores. However, **Student Life** emerged as a significantly weaker aspect, with a rating of 2.33. **Internationality** received a moderate rating of 3.33.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a well-rounded performance, with exceptional strengths in **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are also highly rated, all at 4.33. Professors receive a solid score of 4. The areas that show room for improvement are Internationality, at 3.67, and Accommodations, which is the lowest-rated category at 3.33.
Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise good facilities, well-equipped libraries, and a conducive environment, though some note older buildings and a serious atmosphere.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
All reviews are positive, reflecting a ~100% positive sentiment. Students praise attentive teachers, good educational supervision, and lively student life. Some also appreciate international immersion opportunities and diverse classes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university itself is a bit outdated and the atmosphere can be quite serious. It can be difficult to enjoy the social aspect of university life when you're focused on a demanding academic program. However, it's important to remember that there is a diverse group of students at the university, with a variety of backgrounds and interests. It's possible to find a niche and connect with like-minded people, even in a more traditional academic environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
