Université de Nantes vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs LISAA School of Design vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse course options and competent instructors
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
- +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
- +Supportive environment & welcoming community
- +Prestigious European university for design
- +Focus on practical application over theory
Nothing to show
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- +Modern facilities and accessibility
- +Strong student associations, especially technical ones
- +Well-regarded programmes
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Academic strengths and facilities are notable highlights, with professors receiving a perfect score and facilities earning a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas where improvements could be considered. Overall, the institution offers good value and accommodation options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its modern and accessible environment, though some note challenges joining student associations. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show