Université de Nantes vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs LISAA School of Design vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ecole des Ponts Business School (4.40)
Université de Nantes: wins 0/5 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/5 categories
LISAA School of Design: wins 0/5 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 4/5 categories
Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV: wins 1/5 categories
CESI: wins 0/5 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Art and Design
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Best programme: Software Engineering
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.58
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.75
4.00
Not rated
4.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.54
4.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.15
3.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.54
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.46
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse course options and competent instructors
  • +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
  • +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory

Nothing to show

  • +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
  • +Modern facilities and accessibility
  • +Strong student associations, especially technical ones
  • +Well-regarded programmes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
  • -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.

Academic strengths and facilities are notable highlights, with professors receiving a perfect score and facilities earning a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas where improvements could be considered. Overall, the institution offers good value and accommodation options.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its modern and accessible environment, though some note challenges joining student associations. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
13%
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
4★
77%
100%
0%
60%
100%
0%
0%
3★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close