emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale vs Jean Moulin University Lyon III vs ESSCA School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML: wins 0/7 categories
IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale: wins 0/7 categories
Jean Moulin University Lyon III: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Best programme: Anthropology and Law
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Digital Marketing
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.67
Not rated
3.50
3.50
3.43
5.00
Win
Location
4.66
4.67
Not rated
4.00
4.21
4.64
5.00
Win
Professors
4.12
3.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
3.86
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.63
4.33
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.30
4.33
Not rated
3.50
4.15
4.07
5.00
Win
Value
4.49
4.00
Not rated
4.50
3.79
3.64
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.00
3.14
2.50
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
  • +Supportive environment and accessible services

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment and effective teaching for academic success.
  • +Practical, real-world learning and professional connections
  • +International and diverse environment
  • +High-quality teaching and modern facilities
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive homework and demanding coursework overwhelm students.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from administration and instructors frustrates students.
  • -Outdated resources and inadequate facilities hinder learning and engagement.
  • -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers.
  • -High cost for low value.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a high 4.5. Accomodation and Location also perform well with a 4. Student Life and Facilities, while still respectable, present the weakest areas with a 3.5 rating.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving high marks. It also fares well in **professors** and **internationality**. Conversely, **accommodation** emerges as the weakest area, with the lowest rating. **Facilities** and **value** are rated moderately.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). Students highlight success in law studies and clear guidance.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good experience with practical teaching, international environments, and valuable professional connections. A small portion (~7%) expressed concerns about course relevance and cost.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
0%
50%
29%
21%
100%
4★
27%
67%
0%
0%
43%
50%
0%
3★
10%
33%
0%
50%
21%
43%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close