Riga Technical University - RTU vs Turiba University vs Riga Stradins University - RSU vs University of Latvia - LU vs EKA University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering focus with practical application
- +Professional and understandable professors and staff
- +Modern facilities and well-organized, clear teaching approach
- +Quality of education and engaging courses
- +Convenient and pleasant campus environment
- +Well-organized educational process
- +Supportive and professional professors
- +Excellent academic and practical education
- +Responsive and helpful administration
- +Supportive lecturers and organized study process
- +Abundant extracurricular events and opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and convenient location
- +Recognised degree and career success
- +Helpful, knowledgeable faculty and flexible schedule
- +Affordable study and European exposure
Nothing to show
- +Strong IT, logistics, and engineering programs
- +Practical knowledge and industry-experienced professors
- +Up-to-date infrastructure and labs
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of helpfulness from staff and professors
- -Frequent rent increases for university dorms
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Many instructors lack experience or qualifications.
- -The university prioritizes financial gain over student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Some professors are perceived as unhelpful or lacking engagement.
- -Exploitative financial practices and lack of genuine academic concern are major issues.
- -The university treats students poorly and offers a subpar educational experience.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a major concern.
- -The administrative and management team consistently fails to address student concerns effectively.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
This university garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Location receiving the highest rating. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also score strongly. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score than other aspects. Facilities and Value are rated mid-range, indicating good but not exceptional performance in those categories.
Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students.
This university garners high marks for its **Facilities** (4.17) and **Internationality** (4.25), indicating significant strengths in these areas. It also performs well with **Professors** (4.08) and **Value** (4.08). The **Location** and **Student Life** both received a solid 3.75, while **Accomodation** sits slightly lower at 3.7. Overall, the institution presents a strong academic and international offering, with other aspects maintaining a respectable standing.
This university receives commendations in several key areas, with an outstanding 4.5 for Location. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.38. Facilities and Student Life are well-regarded with a 4.25 rating. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the weaker aspects, with scores of 3.91 and 3.85 respectively.
Considering the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in the area of **Professors**, achieving a score of 3.8. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Value** emerged as the weakest aspects, both receiving a score of 2.6. Other evaluated categories like Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality fell within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
With a mixed performance, this institution excels in its **Location**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating good resources and faculty. However, **Student Life** and **Internationality** show room for improvement. **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, receiving no rating, and **Value** is rated moderately.
With a 4.07 average rating, ~82% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting strong engineering and technical programs with practical learning and modern facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative delays and unhelpful staff.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This feedback highlights a pleasant campus, organized education, and satisfying quality of knowledge.
With a 4.17 average rating, ~74% of 12 reviews are positive, praising inspiring experiences, supportive professors, and helpful administration. A small ~8.3% of feedback is negative, citing administrative issues and overwhelming assignments.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, an organized academic environment, and convenient location. A single negative review found standards low compared to others.
Approximately 40% of reviews are positive, praising program recognition, helpful faculty, and flexible schedules. About 20% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about student treatment and perceived financial exploitation.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 rating from two reviews, students highly praise TSI, particularly for IT, logistics, and engineering programs. They highlight practical knowledge, experienced professors, and up-to-date facilities. No negative feedback was received.
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
This place is for you who want to get advantaged of financially, nothing in this University is working. They do not care about their students. Seek a degree elsewhere. Teachers, administrators and principles are mostly unserious. There are a few good teachers I really adore with very respectable phDs but most of them are in their 20s with bachelors, fresh out of University already teaching.
I'm just started studying Mathematics. The matherial, which lectors are giving to us, and the way of the studying is simple. Also there is options to study by ourselves in rooms with noise isolation. And also I can see, that the university collect a advises from students to develop.
The easiest way to begin with Europe Pretty cheap to study and possible to know more about the European institutions I d strictly recomend it to all the EU newcomers Facilitators are really about to give some Impact to students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
