Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University - UCDC vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Tiffin University Bucharest
Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Accessible and experienced faculty
- +Modern, clean, and pleasant campus facilities
- +Practical and relevant academic programs
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution achieved perfect scores. Its strongest and weakest areas are equally remarkable, with exceptional ratings of 5 out of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in every evaluated domain.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
All three reviews are positive (100%), highlighting approachable professors, a modern and clean campus, and a pleasant, relaxed atmosphere. Easy public transport access was also mentioned.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show