University of Bucharest - UB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS

Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE (4.30)
University of Bucharest - UB: wins 1/7 categories
Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE: wins 0/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 2/7 categories
Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest: wins 4/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/7 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.38
3.78
3.98
Win
2.70
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.61
Win
4.61
3.82
3.90
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.16
3.88
4.15
4.90
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.62
3.79
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.02
4.38
3.97
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.03
4.04
3.98
4.90
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
4.07
3.82
4.80
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Welcoming environment and vibrant student community.
  • +Valuable academic development and cognitive growth.
  • +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
  • +Well-structured curriculum balancing theory and practical application
  • +Excellent career opportunities and professional development
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
  • +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
  • +Accessible location and good transportation links
  • +Ample facilities available

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of professor engagement and overwhelming schedules.
  • -Inadequate and delayed scholarships.
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student-centered focus and administrative neglect.
  • -Poor value for money with a perception of a profit-driven institution.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
  • -lack of resources and support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners its highest marks in **Location** and **Professors**, reflecting strong student satisfaction in these areas. **Student Life** and **Value** also received positive ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest aspects of the student experience, receiving comparatively lower scores. **Internationality** falls in the middle range of assessments.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.61, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.38. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.78. Other assessed aspects like Professors (3.88), Accomodation (4.07), Value (4.04), and Internationality (3.79) fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The University of Bucharest is highly rated by ~74% of reviewers. Students praise knowledgeable faculty, enriching experiences, and a vibrant community. A small percentage (~3%) noted administrative issues and scheduling concerns.

Approximately 74% of 95 reviews are positive, citing structured curricula, knowledgeable professors, and good professional opportunities. A small portion (around 2%) expressed concerns about outdated facilities and perceived institutional priorities.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
47%
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
32%
37%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Good practice, a lot of information but not a lot of job opportunities

It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.

Kind professors and hard-working students

Last year I chose ASE with a pinch of salt, because many of my acquaintances told me from their experience that it is a university where neither the teachers, nor the students are involved in their work. That couldn't be farther from the truth, at least for the German Business Administration faculty where I study. The students here are, though sometimes lazy, really creative and with a desire to put into practice the information that they get from the courses. The professors are really great at sharing their beliefs about different topics and they also put the student in some mind-blowing scenarios, where they really have to activate their brains to come up with a sensible answer. I remember with pleasure how we did unique role-play games during macroeconomics classes, games which made me come to a better understanding of how the market works. I also had quite an annoying experience that I'm going to share with you. It's about the marketing teacher whose courses I attended during the second semester. This person contradicted himself a lot of times and that made him look like he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. In addition to this, he used to mock the students who answered incorrectly to his questions, without even providing himself the right answer in the end. All in all, the entire collective of both students and teachers is welcoming and here at ASE can truly be achieved long-lasting friendships. It's an underrated faculty that I definitely recommend to all the people that are interested in studying smartly.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close